Impact of different mass drug administration strategies for gaining and sustaining control of Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium infection in Africa

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

  • Charles H King
  • Nupur Kittur
  • Sue Binder
  • Carl H Campbell
  • Eliézer K N'Goran
  • Aboulaye Meite
  • Jürg Utzinger
  • Annette Olsen
  • Safari Kinung'hi
  • Alan Fenwick
  • Anna E Phillips
  • Pedro H Gazzinelli-Guimaraes
  • Neerav Dhanani
  • Josefo Ferro
  • Diana M S Karanja
  • Pauline N M Mwinzi
  • Susan P Montgomery
  • Ryan E Wiegand
  • William Evan Secor
  • Amina A Hamidou
  • Amadou Garba
  • Daniel G Colley

This report summarizes the design and outcomes of randomized controlled operational research trials performed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation-funded Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation (SCORE) from 2009 to 2019. Their goal was to define the effectiveness and test the limitations of current WHO-recommended schistosomiasis control protocols by performing large-scale pragmatic trials to compare the impact of different schedules and coverage regimens of praziquantel mass drug administration (MDA). Although there were limitations to study designs and performance, analysis of their primary outcomes confirmed that all tested regimens of praziquantel MDA significantly reduced local Schistosoma infection prevalence and intensity among school-age children. Secondary analysis suggested that outcomes in locations receiving four annual rounds of MDA were better than those in communities that had treatment holiday years, in which no praziquantel MDA was given. Statistical significance of differences was obscured by a wider-than-expected variation in community-level responses to MDA, defining a persistent hot spot obstacle to MDA success. No MDA schedule led to elimination of infection, even in those communities that started at low prevalence of infection, and it is likely that programs aiming for elimination of transmission will need to add supplemental interventions (e.g., snail control, improvement in water, sanitation and hygiene, and behavior change interventions) to achieve that next stage of control. Recommendations for future implementation research, including exploration of the value of earlier program impact assessment combined with intensification of intervention in hot spot locations, are discussed.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Vol/bind103
Udgave nummer1_Suppl
Sider (fra-til)14-23
Antal sider10
ISSN0002-9637
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2020

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 247390759