Smallholder pig production: prevalence and risk factors of ectoparasites

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Smallholder pig production : prevalence and risk factors of ectoparasites. / Braae, Uffe Christian; Ngowi, Helena; Johansen, Maria Vang.

I: Veterinary Parasitology, Bind 196, Nr. 1-2, 2013, s. 241-244.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Braae, UC, Ngowi, H & Johansen, MV 2013, 'Smallholder pig production: prevalence and risk factors of ectoparasites', Veterinary Parasitology, bind 196, nr. 1-2, s. 241-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.058

APA

Braae, U. C., Ngowi, H., & Johansen, M. V. (2013). Smallholder pig production: prevalence and risk factors of ectoparasites. Veterinary Parasitology, 196(1-2), 241-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.058

Vancouver

Braae UC, Ngowi H, Johansen MV. Smallholder pig production: prevalence and risk factors of ectoparasites. Veterinary Parasitology. 2013;196(1-2):241-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.058

Author

Braae, Uffe Christian ; Ngowi, Helena ; Johansen, Maria Vang. / Smallholder pig production : prevalence and risk factors of ectoparasites. I: Veterinary Parasitology. 2013 ; Bind 196, Nr. 1-2. s. 241-244.

Bibtex

@article{388972e2c829421797989b1d5ca30d9f,
title = "Smallholder pig production: prevalence and risk factors of ectoparasites",
abstract = "A cross-sectional study was carried out in the Mbeya Region, Tanzania, with the aim of describing the distribution and diversity of ectoparasites on pigs, within confinement and free-range production systems of smallholder farms. A total of 128 farms were surveyed, with 96 practising confinement and 32 practising free-range production systems. The prevalence of ectoparasites on pigs within confinement and free-range production systems was 24% and 84%, respectively. Logistic regression analyses revealed that keeping pigs in a free-range system and the presence of neighbouring pigs were risk factors for ectoparasites. Within the confinement system, contact with neighbouring pigs and the time interval (in months) since last ectoparasitic treatment were additionally identified as risk factors. The prevalence of Haematopinus suis was 20% in confined pigs and 63% among free-range pigs. Free-ranging of pigs and presence of neighbouring pigs were also identified as risk factors for the presence of lice. Three species of fleas were identified; Tunga penetrans, Echidnophaga gallinacea and Ctenocephalides canis. The prevalence of fleas was 5% and 13% within confined and free-range, respectively. Two pigs (2%) were found infested with Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis. Ticks found belonged to four genera; Amblyomma spp., Rhipicephalus spp., Haemaphysalis spp., and Boophilus spp. The prevalence of hard ticks among the free-range pigs was 50%. Ectoparasites were more prevalent in the free-range system although highly prevalent within both production systems. Keeping pigs in a free-range system and contact with neighbouring pigs were main risk factors for the presence of ectoparasites. Confinement was highly effective as a preventive tool against hard ticks. ",
author = "Braae, {Uffe Christian} and Helena Ngowi and Johansen, {Maria Vang}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.058",
language = "English",
volume = "196",
pages = "241--244",
journal = "Veterinary Parasitology",
issn = "0304-4017",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smallholder pig production

T2 - prevalence and risk factors of ectoparasites

AU - Braae, Uffe Christian

AU - Ngowi, Helena

AU - Johansen, Maria Vang

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - A cross-sectional study was carried out in the Mbeya Region, Tanzania, with the aim of describing the distribution and diversity of ectoparasites on pigs, within confinement and free-range production systems of smallholder farms. A total of 128 farms were surveyed, with 96 practising confinement and 32 practising free-range production systems. The prevalence of ectoparasites on pigs within confinement and free-range production systems was 24% and 84%, respectively. Logistic regression analyses revealed that keeping pigs in a free-range system and the presence of neighbouring pigs were risk factors for ectoparasites. Within the confinement system, contact with neighbouring pigs and the time interval (in months) since last ectoparasitic treatment were additionally identified as risk factors. The prevalence of Haematopinus suis was 20% in confined pigs and 63% among free-range pigs. Free-ranging of pigs and presence of neighbouring pigs were also identified as risk factors for the presence of lice. Three species of fleas were identified; Tunga penetrans, Echidnophaga gallinacea and Ctenocephalides canis. The prevalence of fleas was 5% and 13% within confined and free-range, respectively. Two pigs (2%) were found infested with Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis. Ticks found belonged to four genera; Amblyomma spp., Rhipicephalus spp., Haemaphysalis spp., and Boophilus spp. The prevalence of hard ticks among the free-range pigs was 50%. Ectoparasites were more prevalent in the free-range system although highly prevalent within both production systems. Keeping pigs in a free-range system and contact with neighbouring pigs were main risk factors for the presence of ectoparasites. Confinement was highly effective as a preventive tool against hard ticks.

AB - A cross-sectional study was carried out in the Mbeya Region, Tanzania, with the aim of describing the distribution and diversity of ectoparasites on pigs, within confinement and free-range production systems of smallholder farms. A total of 128 farms were surveyed, with 96 practising confinement and 32 practising free-range production systems. The prevalence of ectoparasites on pigs within confinement and free-range production systems was 24% and 84%, respectively. Logistic regression analyses revealed that keeping pigs in a free-range system and the presence of neighbouring pigs were risk factors for ectoparasites. Within the confinement system, contact with neighbouring pigs and the time interval (in months) since last ectoparasitic treatment were additionally identified as risk factors. The prevalence of Haematopinus suis was 20% in confined pigs and 63% among free-range pigs. Free-ranging of pigs and presence of neighbouring pigs were also identified as risk factors for the presence of lice. Three species of fleas were identified; Tunga penetrans, Echidnophaga gallinacea and Ctenocephalides canis. The prevalence of fleas was 5% and 13% within confined and free-range, respectively. Two pigs (2%) were found infested with Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis. Ticks found belonged to four genera; Amblyomma spp., Rhipicephalus spp., Haemaphysalis spp., and Boophilus spp. The prevalence of hard ticks among the free-range pigs was 50%. Ectoparasites were more prevalent in the free-range system although highly prevalent within both production systems. Keeping pigs in a free-range system and contact with neighbouring pigs were main risk factors for the presence of ectoparasites. Confinement was highly effective as a preventive tool against hard ticks.

U2 - 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.058

DO - 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.058

M3 - Journal article

VL - 196

SP - 241

EP - 244

JO - Veterinary Parasitology

JF - Veterinary Parasitology

SN - 0304-4017

IS - 1-2

ER -

ID: 46403515