Antimicrobial resistance in faecal samples from buffalo, wildebeest and zebra grazing together with and without cattle in Tanzania

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Antimicrobial resistance in faecal samples from buffalo, wildebeest and zebra grazing together with and without cattle in Tanzania. / Katakweba, A. A. S.; Møller, K. S.; Muumba, J.; Muhairwa, A. P.; Damborg, Peter Panduro; Rosenkrantz, Jesper Tjørnhøj; Minga, U. M.; Mtambo, M. M. A.; Olsen, John Elmerdahl.

In: Journal of Applied Microbiology, Vol. 118, No. 4, 04.2015, p. 966-975.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Katakweba, AAS, Møller, KS, Muumba, J, Muhairwa, AP, Damborg, PP, Rosenkrantz, JT, Minga, UM, Mtambo, MMA & Olsen, JE 2015, 'Antimicrobial resistance in faecal samples from buffalo, wildebeest and zebra grazing together with and without cattle in Tanzania', Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 966-975. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12738

APA

Katakweba, A. A. S., Møller, K. S., Muumba, J., Muhairwa, A. P., Damborg, P. P., Rosenkrantz, J. T., Minga, U. M., Mtambo, M. M. A., & Olsen, J. E. (2015). Antimicrobial resistance in faecal samples from buffalo, wildebeest and zebra grazing together with and without cattle in Tanzania. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 118(4), 966-975. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12738

Vancouver

Katakweba AAS, Møller KS, Muumba J, Muhairwa AP, Damborg PP, Rosenkrantz JT et al. Antimicrobial resistance in faecal samples from buffalo, wildebeest and zebra grazing together with and without cattle in Tanzania. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2015 Apr;118(4):966-975. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12738

Author

Katakweba, A. A. S. ; Møller, K. S. ; Muumba, J. ; Muhairwa, A. P. ; Damborg, Peter Panduro ; Rosenkrantz, Jesper Tjørnhøj ; Minga, U. M. ; Mtambo, M. M. A. ; Olsen, John Elmerdahl. / Antimicrobial resistance in faecal samples from buffalo, wildebeest and zebra grazing together with and without cattle in Tanzania. In: Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2015 ; Vol. 118, No. 4. pp. 966-975.

Bibtex

@article{8b7dbb45e99c467592a714dcf03d51a6,
title = "Antimicrobial resistance in faecal samples from buffalo, wildebeest and zebra grazing together with and without cattle in Tanzania",
abstract = "AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether the practice of co-grazing with cattle and wild life constitutes a risk of transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria to wild ungulates.METHODS AND RESULTS: Faecal samples were collected from buffalo (n = 35), wildebeest (n = 40), zebra (n = 40) and cattle (N = 20) from Mikumi National Park, Tanzania (MNP), where cattle is prohibited and from Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA) where co-grazing is practiced. The number of coliforms and enterococci resistant to selected antibiotics was determined. Wild life generally harboured higher number of resistant Escherichia coli and Enterococci than cattle, but with no general influence in wild life of co-grazing with cattle. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci were detected in wild life samples, and E. coli resistant to cefotaxime and enrofloxacin were observed among isolates from all wild life, but not from cattle. Culture independent estimates of the number of sulII gene copies obtained by qPCR did not differ between wild life from the two sample sites, while tetW was significantly higher in samples from MPN than from NCA.CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic resistant bacteria were not more frequently found in ungulates grazing together with cattle than ungulates without this interaction.SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study did not indicate that transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria is a frequent event following co-grazing of wild life and cattle.",
author = "Katakweba, {A. A. S.} and M{\o}ller, {K. S.} and J. Muumba and Muhairwa, {A. P.} and Damborg, {Peter Panduro} and Rosenkrantz, {Jesper Tj{\o}rnh{\o}j} and Minga, {U. M.} and Mtambo, {M. M. A.} and Olsen, {John Elmerdahl}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2014 The Society for Applied Microbiology.",
year = "2015",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1111/jam.12738",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "966--975",
journal = "Proceedings of the Society for Applied Bacteriology",
issn = "0370-1778",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antimicrobial resistance in faecal samples from buffalo, wildebeest and zebra grazing together with and without cattle in Tanzania

AU - Katakweba, A. A. S.

AU - Møller, K. S.

AU - Muumba, J.

AU - Muhairwa, A. P.

AU - Damborg, Peter Panduro

AU - Rosenkrantz, Jesper Tjørnhøj

AU - Minga, U. M.

AU - Mtambo, M. M. A.

AU - Olsen, John Elmerdahl

N1 - © 2014 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether the practice of co-grazing with cattle and wild life constitutes a risk of transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria to wild ungulates.METHODS AND RESULTS: Faecal samples were collected from buffalo (n = 35), wildebeest (n = 40), zebra (n = 40) and cattle (N = 20) from Mikumi National Park, Tanzania (MNP), where cattle is prohibited and from Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA) where co-grazing is practiced. The number of coliforms and enterococci resistant to selected antibiotics was determined. Wild life generally harboured higher number of resistant Escherichia coli and Enterococci than cattle, but with no general influence in wild life of co-grazing with cattle. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci were detected in wild life samples, and E. coli resistant to cefotaxime and enrofloxacin were observed among isolates from all wild life, but not from cattle. Culture independent estimates of the number of sulII gene copies obtained by qPCR did not differ between wild life from the two sample sites, while tetW was significantly higher in samples from MPN than from NCA.CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic resistant bacteria were not more frequently found in ungulates grazing together with cattle than ungulates without this interaction.SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study did not indicate that transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria is a frequent event following co-grazing of wild life and cattle.

AB - AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether the practice of co-grazing with cattle and wild life constitutes a risk of transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria to wild ungulates.METHODS AND RESULTS: Faecal samples were collected from buffalo (n = 35), wildebeest (n = 40), zebra (n = 40) and cattle (N = 20) from Mikumi National Park, Tanzania (MNP), where cattle is prohibited and from Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA) where co-grazing is practiced. The number of coliforms and enterococci resistant to selected antibiotics was determined. Wild life generally harboured higher number of resistant Escherichia coli and Enterococci than cattle, but with no general influence in wild life of co-grazing with cattle. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci were detected in wild life samples, and E. coli resistant to cefotaxime and enrofloxacin were observed among isolates from all wild life, but not from cattle. Culture independent estimates of the number of sulII gene copies obtained by qPCR did not differ between wild life from the two sample sites, while tetW was significantly higher in samples from MPN than from NCA.CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic resistant bacteria were not more frequently found in ungulates grazing together with cattle than ungulates without this interaction.SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study did not indicate that transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria is a frequent event following co-grazing of wild life and cattle.

U2 - 10.1111/jam.12738

DO - 10.1111/jam.12738

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25641381

VL - 118

SP - 966

EP - 975

JO - Proceedings of the Society for Applied Bacteriology

JF - Proceedings of the Society for Applied Bacteriology

SN - 0370-1778

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 144448830