Comparative methane estimation from cattle based on total CO2 production using different techniques

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Comparative methane estimation from cattle based on total CO2 production using different techniques. / Haque, Md N.; Hansen, Hanne H.; Storm, Ida M.L.D.; Madsen, Jørgen.

In: Animal Nutrition, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2017, p. 175-179.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Haque, MN, Hansen, HH, Storm, IMLD & Madsen, J 2017, 'Comparative methane estimation from cattle based on total CO2 production using different techniques', Animal Nutrition, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 175-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.04.004

APA

Haque, M. N., Hansen, H. H., Storm, I. M. L. D., & Madsen, J. (2017). Comparative methane estimation from cattle based on total CO2 production using different techniques. Animal Nutrition, 3(2), 175-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.04.004

Vancouver

Haque MN, Hansen HH, Storm IMLD, Madsen J. Comparative methane estimation from cattle based on total CO2 production using different techniques. Animal Nutrition. 2017;3(2):175-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.04.004

Author

Haque, Md N. ; Hansen, Hanne H. ; Storm, Ida M.L.D. ; Madsen, Jørgen. / Comparative methane estimation from cattle based on total CO2 production using different techniques. In: Animal Nutrition. 2017 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 175-179.

Bibtex

@article{053fcb30f9c04acdab4ecb116fb0535f,
title = "Comparative methane estimation from cattle based on total CO2 production using different techniques",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to compare the precision of CH4 estimates using calculated CO2 (HP) by the CO2 method (CO2T) and measured CO2 in the respiration chamber (CO2R). The CO2R and CO2T study was conducted as a 3 × 3 Latin square design where 3 Dexter heifers were allocated to metabolic cages for 3 periods. Each period consisted of 2 weeks of adaptation followed by 1 week of measurement with the CO2R and CO2T. The average body weight of the heifer was 226 ± 11 kg (means ± SD). They were fed a total mixed ration, twice daily, with 1 of 3 supplements: wheat (W), molasses (M), or molasses mixed with sodium bicarbonate (Mbic). The dry mater intake (DMI; kg/day) was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in the metabolic cage compared with that in the respiration chamber. The daily CH4 (L/day) emission was strongly correlated (r = 0.78) between CO2T and CO2R. The daily CH4 (L/kg DMI) emission by the CO2T was in the same magnitude as by the CO2R. The measured CO2 (L/day) production in the respiration chamber was not different (P = 0.39) from the calculated CO2 production using the CO2T. This result concludes a reasonable accuracy and precision of CH4 estimation by the CO2T compared with the CO2R.",
keywords = "Carbon dioxide, Measurement, Methane, Precision, Respiration chamber",
author = "Haque, {Md N.} and Hansen, {Hanne H.} and Storm, {Ida M.L.D.} and J{\o}rgen Madsen",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.aninu.2017.04.004",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "175--179",
journal = "Animal Nutrition",
issn = "2405-6545",
publisher = "KeAi Communications Co",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative methane estimation from cattle based on total CO2 production using different techniques

AU - Haque, Md N.

AU - Hansen, Hanne H.

AU - Storm, Ida M.L.D.

AU - Madsen, Jørgen

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The objective of this study was to compare the precision of CH4 estimates using calculated CO2 (HP) by the CO2 method (CO2T) and measured CO2 in the respiration chamber (CO2R). The CO2R and CO2T study was conducted as a 3 × 3 Latin square design where 3 Dexter heifers were allocated to metabolic cages for 3 periods. Each period consisted of 2 weeks of adaptation followed by 1 week of measurement with the CO2R and CO2T. The average body weight of the heifer was 226 ± 11 kg (means ± SD). They were fed a total mixed ration, twice daily, with 1 of 3 supplements: wheat (W), molasses (M), or molasses mixed with sodium bicarbonate (Mbic). The dry mater intake (DMI; kg/day) was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in the metabolic cage compared with that in the respiration chamber. The daily CH4 (L/day) emission was strongly correlated (r = 0.78) between CO2T and CO2R. The daily CH4 (L/kg DMI) emission by the CO2T was in the same magnitude as by the CO2R. The measured CO2 (L/day) production in the respiration chamber was not different (P = 0.39) from the calculated CO2 production using the CO2T. This result concludes a reasonable accuracy and precision of CH4 estimation by the CO2T compared with the CO2R.

AB - The objective of this study was to compare the precision of CH4 estimates using calculated CO2 (HP) by the CO2 method (CO2T) and measured CO2 in the respiration chamber (CO2R). The CO2R and CO2T study was conducted as a 3 × 3 Latin square design where 3 Dexter heifers were allocated to metabolic cages for 3 periods. Each period consisted of 2 weeks of adaptation followed by 1 week of measurement with the CO2R and CO2T. The average body weight of the heifer was 226 ± 11 kg (means ± SD). They were fed a total mixed ration, twice daily, with 1 of 3 supplements: wheat (W), molasses (M), or molasses mixed with sodium bicarbonate (Mbic). The dry mater intake (DMI; kg/day) was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in the metabolic cage compared with that in the respiration chamber. The daily CH4 (L/day) emission was strongly correlated (r = 0.78) between CO2T and CO2R. The daily CH4 (L/kg DMI) emission by the CO2T was in the same magnitude as by the CO2R. The measured CO2 (L/day) production in the respiration chamber was not different (P = 0.39) from the calculated CO2 production using the CO2T. This result concludes a reasonable accuracy and precision of CH4 estimation by the CO2T compared with the CO2R.

KW - Carbon dioxide

KW - Measurement

KW - Methane

KW - Precision

KW - Respiration chamber

U2 - 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.04.004

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29767103

AN - SCOPUS:85024374664

VL - 3

SP - 175

EP - 179

JO - Animal Nutrition

JF - Animal Nutrition

SN - 2405-6545

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 192054896