Monthly variation in the probability of presence of adult Culicoides populations in nine European countries and the implications for targeted surveillance

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Ana Carolina Cuellar
  • Andreas Baum
  • Anders Stockmarr
  • Henrik Skovgard
  • Søren Achim Nielsen
  • Mats Gunnar Andersson
  • Anders Lindström
  • Jan Chirico
  • Renke Lühken
  • Sonja Steinke
  • Ellen Kiel
  • Jörn Gethmann
  • Franz J Conraths
  • Magdalena Larska
  • Marcin Smreczak
  • Anna Orłowska
  • Inger Hamnes
  • Ståle Sviland
  • Petter Hopp
  • Katharina Brugger
  • Franz Rubel
  • Thomas Balenghien
  • Claire Garros
  • Ignace Rakotoarivony
  • Xavier Allène
  • Jonathan Lhoir
  • David Chavernac
  • Jean-Claude Delécolle
  • Bruno Mathieu
  • Delphine Delécolle
  • Marie-Laure Setier-Rio
  • Roger Venail
  • Bethsabée Scheid
  • Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
  • Carlos Barceló
  • Javier Lucientes
  • Rosa Estrada
  • Alexander Mathis
  • Wesley Tack
Background
Biting midges of the genus Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) are small hematophagous insects responsible for the transmission of bluetongue virus, Schmallenberg virus and African horse sickness virus to wild and domestic ruminants and equids. Outbreaks of these viruses have caused economic damage within the European Union. The spatio-temporal distribution of biting midges is a key factor in identifying areas with the potential for disease spread. The aim of this study was to identify and map areas of neglectable adult activity for each month in an average year. Average monthly risk maps can be used as a tool when allocating resources for surveillance and control programs within Europe.

Methods
We modelled the occurrence of C. imicola and the Obsoletus and Pulicaris ensembles using existing entomological surveillance data from Spain, France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Poland. The monthly probability of each vector species and ensembles being present in Europe based on climatic and environmental input variables was estimated with the machine learning technique Random Forest. Subsequently, the monthly probability was classified into three classes: Absence, Presence and Uncertain status. These three classes are useful for mapping areas of no risk, areas of high-risk targeted for animal movement restrictions, and areas with an uncertain status that need active entomological surveillance to determine whether or not vectors are present.

Results
The distribution of Culicoides species ensembles were in agreement with their previously reported distribution in Europe. The Random Forest models were very accurate in predicting the probability of presence for C. imicola (mean AUC = 0.95), less accurate for the Obsoletus ensemble (mean AUC = 0.84), while the lowest accuracy was found for the Pulicaris ensemble (mean AUC = 0.71). The most important environmental variables in the models were related to temperature and precipitation for all three groups.

Conclusions
The duration periods with low or null adult activity can be derived from the associated monthly distribution maps, and it was also possible to identify and map areas with uncertain predictions. In the absence of ongoing vector surveillance, these maps can be used by veterinary authorities to classify areas as likely vector-free or as likely risk areas from southern Spain to northern Sweden with acceptable precision. The maps can also focus costly entomological surveillance to seasons and areas where the predictions and vector-free status remain uncertain.
Original languageEnglish
Article number608
JournalParasites & Vectors
Volume11
ISSN1756-3305
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

ID: 211099407