Pilot testing the EARS-Vet surveillance network for antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens from animals in the EU/EEA

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 1.05 MB, PDF document

  • Justine Lagrange
  • Jean Philippe Amat
  • Cristina Ballesteros
  • Damborg, Peter Panduro
  • Thomas Grönthal
  • Marisa Haenni
  • Eric Jouy
  • Heike Kaspar
  • Kevin Kenny
  • Babette Klein
  • Agnese Lupo
  • Jean Yves Madec
  • Charlotte Mark Salomonsen
  • Elisabeth Müller
  • Cristina Muñoz Madero
  • Oskar Nilsson
  • Madelaine Norström
  • Suvi Nykäsenoja
  • Gudrun Overesch
  • Karl Pedersen
  • Tarja Pohjanvirta
  • Rosemarie Slowey
  • Cristiana Teixeira Justo
  • Anne Margrete Urdahl
  • Christos Zafeiridis
  • Eric Zini
  • Géraldine Cazeau
  • Nathalie Jarrige
  • Lucie Collineau
  • on behalf of the EARS-Vet network

Introduction: As part of the EU Joint Action on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) and Healthcare-Associated Infections, an initiative has been launched to build the European AMR Surveillance network in veterinary medicine (EARS-Vet). So far, activities included mapping national systems for AMR surveillance in animal bacterial pathogens, and defining the EARS-Vet objectives, scope, and standards. Drawing on these milestones, this study aimed to pilot test EARS-Vet surveillance, namely to (i) assess available data, (ii) perform cross-country analyses, and (iii) identify potential challenges and develop recommendations to improve future data collection and analysis. Methods: Eleven partners from nine EU/EEA countries participated and shared available data for the period 2016–2020, representing a total of 140,110 bacterial isolates and 1,302,389 entries (isolate-antibiotic agent combinations). Results: Collected data were highly diverse and fragmented. Using a standardized approach and interpretation with epidemiological cut-offs, we were able to jointly analyze AMR trends of 53 combinations of animal host-bacteria–antibiotic categories of interest to EARS-Vet. This work demonstrated substantial variations of resistance levels, both among and within countries (e.g., between animal host species). Discussion: Key issues at this stage include the lack of harmonization of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods used in European surveillance systems and veterinary diagnostic laboratories, the absence of interpretation criteria for many bacteria–antibiotic combinations of interest, and the lack of data from a lot of EU/EEA countries where little or even surveillance currently exists. Still, this pilot study provides a proof-of-concept of what EARS-Vet can achieve. Results form an important basis to shape future systematic data collection and analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1188423
JournalFrontiers in Microbiology
Volume14
ISSN1664-302X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Lagrange, Amat, Ballesteros, Damborg, Grönthal, Haenni, Jouy, Kaspar, Kenny, Klein, Lupo, Madec, Salomonsen, Müller, Madero, Nilsson, Norström, Nykäsenoja, Overesch, Pedersen, Pohjanvirta, Slowey, Justo, Urdahl, Zafeiridis, Zini, Cazeau, Jarrige, Collineau and on behalf of the EARS-Vet network.

    Research areas

  • antimicrobial resistance, integrated surveillance, monitoring, One Health, veterinary clinical pathogens

ID: 357847927