Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Nils Haug
  • Lukas Geyrhofer
  • Alessandro Londei
  • Elma Dervic
  • Amélie Desvars-Larrive
  • Vittorio Loreto
  • Conrady, Beate
  • Stefan Thurner
  • Peter Klimek

Assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 is critical to inform future preparedness response plans. Here we quantify the impact of 6,068 hierarchically coded NPIs implemented in 79 territories on the effective reproduction number, Rt, of COVID-19. We propose a modelling approach that combines four computational techniques merging statistical, inference and artificial intelligence tools. We validate our findings with two external datasets recording 42,151 additional NPIs from 226 countries. Our results indicate that a suitable combination of NPIs is necessary to curb the spread of the virus. Less disruptive and costly NPIs can be as effective as more intrusive, drastic, ones (for example, a national lockdown). Using country-specific ‘what-if’ scenarios, we assess how the effectiveness of NPIs depends on the local context such as timing of their adoption, opening the way for forecasting the effectiveness of future interventions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNature Human Behaviour
Volume4
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)1303-1312
Number of pages10
ISSN2397-3374
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020
Externally publishedYes

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 259316184