Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in cattle and horses

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

Standard

Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in cattle and horses. / EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare, ; Nielsen, Søren Saxmose; Bicout, Dominique Joseph; Calistri, Paolo; Canali, Elisabetta; Drewe, Julian Ashley; Garin-Bastuji, Bruno; Gonzales Rojas, José Luis; Gortázar, Christian; Herskin, Mette S; Michel, Virginie; Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel; Padalino, Barbara; Pasquali, Paolo; Roberts, Helen Clare; Spoolder, Hans; Ståhl, Karl; Velarde, Antonio; Viltrop, Arvo; Winckler, Christoph; Baldinelli, Francesca; Broglia, Alessandro; Kohnle, Lisa; Alvarez, Julio.

In: EFSA Journal, Vol. 20, No. 5, e07312, 10.05.2022, p. 1-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

Harvard

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare, , Nielsen, SS, Bicout, DJ, Calistri, P, Canali, E, Drewe, JA, Garin-Bastuji, B, Gonzales Rojas, JL, Gortázar, C, Herskin, MS, Michel, V, Miranda Chueca, MÁ, Padalino, B, Pasquali, P, Roberts, HC, Spoolder, H, Ståhl, K, Velarde, A, Viltrop, A, Winckler, C, Baldinelli, F, Broglia, A, Kohnle, L & Alvarez, J 2022, 'Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in cattle and horses', EFSA Journal, vol. 20, no. 5, e07312, pp. 1-103. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7312

APA

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare, Nielsen, S. S., Bicout, D. J., Calistri, P., Canali, E., Drewe, J. A., Garin-Bastuji, B., Gonzales Rojas, J. L., Gortázar, C., Herskin, M. S., Michel, V., Miranda Chueca, M. Á., Padalino, B., Pasquali, P., Roberts, H. C., Spoolder, H., Ståhl, K., Velarde, A., Viltrop, A., ... Alvarez, J. (2022). Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in cattle and horses. EFSA Journal, 20(5), 1-103. [e07312]. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7312

Vancouver

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare , Nielsen SS, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA et al. Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in cattle and horses. EFSA Journal. 2022 May 10;20(5):1-103. e07312. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7312

Author

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare, ; Nielsen, Søren Saxmose ; Bicout, Dominique Joseph ; Calistri, Paolo ; Canali, Elisabetta ; Drewe, Julian Ashley ; Garin-Bastuji, Bruno ; Gonzales Rojas, José Luis ; Gortázar, Christian ; Herskin, Mette S ; Michel, Virginie ; Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel ; Padalino, Barbara ; Pasquali, Paolo ; Roberts, Helen Clare ; Spoolder, Hans ; Ståhl, Karl ; Velarde, Antonio ; Viltrop, Arvo ; Winckler, Christoph ; Baldinelli, Francesca ; Broglia, Alessandro ; Kohnle, Lisa ; Alvarez, Julio. / Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in cattle and horses. In: EFSA Journal. 2022 ; Vol. 20, No. 5. pp. 1-103.

Bibtex

@article{c4a7367ef7774b778bec3dba70145055,
title = "Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in cattle and horses",
abstract = "Abstract Staphylococcus aureus (S.?aureus) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for cattle and horses in previous scientific opinions. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9, and Article 8 for listing animal species related to the bacterium. The assessment has been performed following a methodology previously published. The outcome is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether AMR S.?aureus can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (60?90% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that the bacterium does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2 and 4 (Categories A, B and D; 1?5%, 5?10% and 10?33% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) and the AHAW Panel was uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 3 and 5 (Categories C and E, 33?90% and 60?90% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The animal species to be listed for AMR S.?aureus according to Article 8 criteria include mainly mammals, birds, reptiles and fish.",
keywords = "antimicrobial resistance, Staphylococcus aureus, Animal Health Law, listing, categorisation, impact",
author = "{EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare} and Nielsen, {S{\o}ren Saxmose} and Bicout, {Dominique Joseph} and Paolo Calistri and Elisabetta Canali and Drewe, {Julian Ashley} and Bruno Garin-Bastuji and {Gonzales Rojas}, {Jos{\'e} Luis} and Christian Gort{\'a}zar and Herskin, {Mette S} and Virginie Michel and {Miranda Chueca}, {Miguel {\'A}ngel} and Barbara Padalino and Paolo Pasquali and Roberts, {Helen Clare} and Hans Spoolder and Karl St{\aa}hl and Antonio Velarde and Arvo Viltrop and Christoph Winckler and Francesca Baldinelli and Alessandro Broglia and Lisa Kohnle and Julio Alvarez",
note = "https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7312",
year = "2022",
month = may,
day = "10",
doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7312",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1--103",
journal = "E F S A Journal",
issn = "1831-4732",
publisher = "European Food Safety Authority (E F S A)",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in cattle and horses

AU - EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare, null

AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose

AU - Bicout, Dominique Joseph

AU - Calistri, Paolo

AU - Canali, Elisabetta

AU - Drewe, Julian Ashley

AU - Garin-Bastuji, Bruno

AU - Gonzales Rojas, José Luis

AU - Gortázar, Christian

AU - Herskin, Mette S

AU - Michel, Virginie

AU - Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel

AU - Padalino, Barbara

AU - Pasquali, Paolo

AU - Roberts, Helen Clare

AU - Spoolder, Hans

AU - Ståhl, Karl

AU - Velarde, Antonio

AU - Viltrop, Arvo

AU - Winckler, Christoph

AU - Baldinelli, Francesca

AU - Broglia, Alessandro

AU - Kohnle, Lisa

AU - Alvarez, Julio

N1 - https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7312

PY - 2022/5/10

Y1 - 2022/5/10

N2 - Abstract Staphylococcus aureus (S.?aureus) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for cattle and horses in previous scientific opinions. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9, and Article 8 for listing animal species related to the bacterium. The assessment has been performed following a methodology previously published. The outcome is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether AMR S.?aureus can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (60?90% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that the bacterium does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2 and 4 (Categories A, B and D; 1?5%, 5?10% and 10?33% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) and the AHAW Panel was uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 3 and 5 (Categories C and E, 33?90% and 60?90% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The animal species to be listed for AMR S.?aureus according to Article 8 criteria include mainly mammals, birds, reptiles and fish.

AB - Abstract Staphylococcus aureus (S.?aureus) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for cattle and horses in previous scientific opinions. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9, and Article 8 for listing animal species related to the bacterium. The assessment has been performed following a methodology previously published. The outcome is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether AMR S.?aureus can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (60?90% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that the bacterium does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2 and 4 (Categories A, B and D; 1?5%, 5?10% and 10?33% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) and the AHAW Panel was uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 3 and 5 (Categories C and E, 33?90% and 60?90% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The animal species to be listed for AMR S.?aureus according to Article 8 criteria include mainly mammals, birds, reptiles and fish.

KW - antimicrobial resistance

KW - Staphylococcus aureus

KW - Animal Health Law

KW - listing

KW - categorisation

KW - impact

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7312

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7312

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35582361

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 103

JO - E F S A Journal

JF - E F S A Journal

SN - 1831-4732

IS - 5

M1 - e07312

ER -

ID: 305795872