Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Newcastle disease

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 8.29 MB, PDF document

  • EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare
  • Julio Alvarez
  • Dominique Joseph Bicout
  • Paolo Calistri
  • Elisabetta Canali
  • Julian Ashley Drewe
  • Bruno Garin-Bastuji
  • José Luis Gonzales Rojas
  • Christian Gortázar Schmidt
  • Mette Herskin
  • Virginie Michel
  • Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
  • Barbara Padalino
  • Paolo Pasquali
  • Hans Spoolder
  • Karl Ståhl
  • Antonio Velarde
  • Arvo Viltrop
  • Christoph Winckler
  • Simon Gubbins
  • Jan Arend Stegeman
  • Sotiria-Eleni Antoniou
  • Inma Aznar
  • Alessandro Broglia
  • Yves Van der Stede
  • Gabriele Zancanaro
  • Helen Clare Roberts
Abstract EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Newcastle disease (ND). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. The monitoring period (21 days) was assessed as effective in non-vaccinated chicken and turkey flocks, although large uncertainty remains surrounding the effectiveness of this period in vaccinated galliform flocks and flocks of other bird species. It was also concluded that the protection (3 km radius) and the surveillance (10 km radius) zones contain 99 as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to ND.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere06946
JournalEFSA Journal
Volume19
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)1-85
Number of pages85
ISSN1831-4732
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

ID: 286018549