Gross and histopathological evaluation of umbilical outpouchings in pigs

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Gross and histopathological evaluation of umbilical outpouchings in pigs. / Hovmand-Hansen, Trine; Jensen, Tina B; Nielsen, Søren S; Vestergaard, Kaj; Nielsen, Mai Britt F; Leifsson, Páll S; Jensen, Henrik E.

In: Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 203, 105621, 2022, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hovmand-Hansen, T, Jensen, TB, Nielsen, SS, Vestergaard, K, Nielsen, MBF, Leifsson, PS & Jensen, HE 2022, 'Gross and histopathological evaluation of umbilical outpouchings in pigs', Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 203, 105621, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105621

APA

Hovmand-Hansen, T., Jensen, T. B., Nielsen, S. S., Vestergaard, K., Nielsen, M. B. F., Leifsson, P. S., & Jensen, H. E. (2022). Gross and histopathological evaluation of umbilical outpouchings in pigs. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 203, 1-8. [105621]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105621

Vancouver

Hovmand-Hansen T, Jensen TB, Nielsen SS, Vestergaard K, Nielsen MBF, Leifsson PS et al. Gross and histopathological evaluation of umbilical outpouchings in pigs. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2022;203:1-8. 105621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105621

Author

Hovmand-Hansen, Trine ; Jensen, Tina B ; Nielsen, Søren S ; Vestergaard, Kaj ; Nielsen, Mai Britt F ; Leifsson, Páll S ; Jensen, Henrik E. / Gross and histopathological evaluation of umbilical outpouchings in pigs. In: Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2022 ; Vol. 203. pp. 1-8.

Bibtex

@article{4b79d1a1ffa841d890d72895140e2200,
title = "Gross and histopathological evaluation of umbilical outpouchings in pigs",
abstract = "Clinical presentations of umbilical outpouchings (UOs) in pigs cover a variety of pathological manifestations. Pigs with UOs often do not reach the abattoir as they die due to complications or are euthanized for welfare concerns. The primary objective was to characterize the gross appearance of UOs in pigs with respect to the different types of pathological manifestations. Also the association between the pathological manifestation and presence of a wound on the UO was evaluated. Pigs (in different age groups, n = 444) with an UO were sampled in Denmark from different locations (two herds and at an abattoir) and examined post mortem. Tissue samples from animals with an enterocystoma or internal umbilical proliferations were collected for histological and immunohistochemical characterization. Hernia umbilicalis was the most frequent cause (72%, n = 320) of the UOs. It was the only diagnosis in 57% (n = 254) of the pigs, and in 15% (n = 66) of the pigs the hernia appeared in combination with other manifestations. Thus, 28% (n = 124) of the pigs were diagnosed with an enterocystoma, internal umbilical proliferations, subcutaneous abscess/ fibrosis or another diagnosis, presented alone or in combination. The distribution of diagnoses varied in the different age groups. Overall, 38% (110/291) of the pigs presented a wound on the UOs post mortem. The age of the pigs confounded the relation between the pathological manifestation and the presence of a wound. The odds that an UO had a wound were lower among pigs with a subcutaneous abscess/ fibrosis compared to pigs diagnosed with an umbilical hernia or enterocystoma (OR, 0.3; 95% Cl, 0.1-0.7). The odds of wounds were higher among weaners (OR, 4.3; 95% Cl 2.3-8.3) and finishers (OR, 6.5; 95% Cl, 3.4-12.7) compared with piglets from the farrowing unit. The area of wounds ranged from 0.03 to 78.5 cm 2 and increased with age (P < 0.001). Histologically and immunohistochemically the enterocystomas and internal umbilical proliferations seemed to be lined with mesothelial cells and both had a content comparable with mesenchymal embryonic connective tissue. However, only the cavities of the enterocystomas were also lined with mesothelial cells. In conclusion, UOs in pigs are caused by complex pathological conditions with hernia umbilicalis as the dominating diagnosis. Knowledge clarifying the different pathological manifestations causing an UO and the presence of wounds on the UOs is essential for future prevention strategies. ",
author = "Trine Hovmand-Hansen and Jensen, {Tina B} and Nielsen, {S{\o}ren S} and Kaj Vestergaard and Nielsen, {Mai Britt F} and Leifsson, {P{\'a}ll S} and Jensen, {Henrik E}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105621",
language = "English",
volume = "203",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Preventive Veterinary Medicine",
issn = "0167-5877",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gross and histopathological evaluation of umbilical outpouchings in pigs

AU - Hovmand-Hansen, Trine

AU - Jensen, Tina B

AU - Nielsen, Søren S

AU - Vestergaard, Kaj

AU - Nielsen, Mai Britt F

AU - Leifsson, Páll S

AU - Jensen, Henrik E

N1 - Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Clinical presentations of umbilical outpouchings (UOs) in pigs cover a variety of pathological manifestations. Pigs with UOs often do not reach the abattoir as they die due to complications or are euthanized for welfare concerns. The primary objective was to characterize the gross appearance of UOs in pigs with respect to the different types of pathological manifestations. Also the association between the pathological manifestation and presence of a wound on the UO was evaluated. Pigs (in different age groups, n = 444) with an UO were sampled in Denmark from different locations (two herds and at an abattoir) and examined post mortem. Tissue samples from animals with an enterocystoma or internal umbilical proliferations were collected for histological and immunohistochemical characterization. Hernia umbilicalis was the most frequent cause (72%, n = 320) of the UOs. It was the only diagnosis in 57% (n = 254) of the pigs, and in 15% (n = 66) of the pigs the hernia appeared in combination with other manifestations. Thus, 28% (n = 124) of the pigs were diagnosed with an enterocystoma, internal umbilical proliferations, subcutaneous abscess/ fibrosis or another diagnosis, presented alone or in combination. The distribution of diagnoses varied in the different age groups. Overall, 38% (110/291) of the pigs presented a wound on the UOs post mortem. The age of the pigs confounded the relation between the pathological manifestation and the presence of a wound. The odds that an UO had a wound were lower among pigs with a subcutaneous abscess/ fibrosis compared to pigs diagnosed with an umbilical hernia or enterocystoma (OR, 0.3; 95% Cl, 0.1-0.7). The odds of wounds were higher among weaners (OR, 4.3; 95% Cl 2.3-8.3) and finishers (OR, 6.5; 95% Cl, 3.4-12.7) compared with piglets from the farrowing unit. The area of wounds ranged from 0.03 to 78.5 cm 2 and increased with age (P < 0.001). Histologically and immunohistochemically the enterocystomas and internal umbilical proliferations seemed to be lined with mesothelial cells and both had a content comparable with mesenchymal embryonic connective tissue. However, only the cavities of the enterocystomas were also lined with mesothelial cells. In conclusion, UOs in pigs are caused by complex pathological conditions with hernia umbilicalis as the dominating diagnosis. Knowledge clarifying the different pathological manifestations causing an UO and the presence of wounds on the UOs is essential for future prevention strategies.

AB - Clinical presentations of umbilical outpouchings (UOs) in pigs cover a variety of pathological manifestations. Pigs with UOs often do not reach the abattoir as they die due to complications or are euthanized for welfare concerns. The primary objective was to characterize the gross appearance of UOs in pigs with respect to the different types of pathological manifestations. Also the association between the pathological manifestation and presence of a wound on the UO was evaluated. Pigs (in different age groups, n = 444) with an UO were sampled in Denmark from different locations (two herds and at an abattoir) and examined post mortem. Tissue samples from animals with an enterocystoma or internal umbilical proliferations were collected for histological and immunohistochemical characterization. Hernia umbilicalis was the most frequent cause (72%, n = 320) of the UOs. It was the only diagnosis in 57% (n = 254) of the pigs, and in 15% (n = 66) of the pigs the hernia appeared in combination with other manifestations. Thus, 28% (n = 124) of the pigs were diagnosed with an enterocystoma, internal umbilical proliferations, subcutaneous abscess/ fibrosis or another diagnosis, presented alone or in combination. The distribution of diagnoses varied in the different age groups. Overall, 38% (110/291) of the pigs presented a wound on the UOs post mortem. The age of the pigs confounded the relation between the pathological manifestation and the presence of a wound. The odds that an UO had a wound were lower among pigs with a subcutaneous abscess/ fibrosis compared to pigs diagnosed with an umbilical hernia or enterocystoma (OR, 0.3; 95% Cl, 0.1-0.7). The odds of wounds were higher among weaners (OR, 4.3; 95% Cl 2.3-8.3) and finishers (OR, 6.5; 95% Cl, 3.4-12.7) compared with piglets from the farrowing unit. The area of wounds ranged from 0.03 to 78.5 cm 2 and increased with age (P < 0.001). Histologically and immunohistochemically the enterocystomas and internal umbilical proliferations seemed to be lined with mesothelial cells and both had a content comparable with mesenchymal embryonic connective tissue. However, only the cavities of the enterocystomas were also lined with mesothelial cells. In conclusion, UOs in pigs are caused by complex pathological conditions with hernia umbilicalis as the dominating diagnosis. Knowledge clarifying the different pathological manifestations causing an UO and the presence of wounds on the UOs is essential for future prevention strategies.

U2 - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105621

DO - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105621

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35344801

VL - 203

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

JF - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

SN - 0167-5877

M1 - 105621

ER -

ID: 302047639