Guidance on aneugenicity assessment
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research
Standard
Guidance on aneugenicity assessment. / EFSA Scientific Committee; More, Simon John; Bampidis, Vasileios; Bragard, Claude; Halldorsson, Thorhallur Ingi; Hernández-Jerez, Antonio F; Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne; Koutsoumanis, Kostas; Lambré, Claude; Machera, Kyriaki; Naegeli, Hanspeter; Nielsen, Søren Saxmose; Schlatter, Josef; Schrenk, Dieter; Turck, Dominique; Younes, Maged; Aquilina, Gabriele; Bignami, Margherita; Bolognesi, Claudia; Crebelli, Riccardo; Gürtler, Rainer; Marcon, Francesca; Nielsen, Elsa; Vleminckx, Christiane; Carfì, Maria; Martino, Carla; Maurici, Daniela; Parra Morte, Juan; Rossi, Annamaria; Benford, Diane.
In: EFSA Journal, Vol. 19, No. 8, e06770, 2021, p. 1-27.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidance on aneugenicity assessment
AU - EFSA Scientific Committee, null
AU - More, Simon John
AU - Bampidis, Vasileios
AU - Bragard, Claude
AU - Halldorsson, Thorhallur Ingi
AU - Hernández-Jerez, Antonio F
AU - Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne
AU - Koutsoumanis, Kostas
AU - Lambré, Claude
AU - Machera, Kyriaki
AU - Naegeli, Hanspeter
AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
AU - Schlatter, Josef
AU - Schrenk, Dieter
AU - Turck, Dominique
AU - Younes, Maged
AU - Aquilina, Gabriele
AU - Bignami, Margherita
AU - Bolognesi, Claudia
AU - Crebelli, Riccardo
AU - Gürtler, Rainer
AU - Marcon, Francesca
AU - Nielsen, Elsa
AU - Vleminckx, Christiane
AU - Carfì, Maria
AU - Martino, Carla
AU - Maurici, Daniela
AU - Parra Morte, Juan
AU - Rossi, Annamaria
AU - Benford, Diane
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Abstract The EFSA Scientific Committee was asked to provide guidance on the most appropriate in vivo tests to follow up on positive in vitro results for aneugenicity, and on the approach to risk assessment for substances that are aneugenic but not clastogenic nor causing gene mutations. The Scientific Committee confirmed that the preferred approach is to perform an in vivo mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test with a relevant route of administration. If this is positive, it demonstrates that the substance is aneugenic in vivo. A negative result with evidence that the bone marrow is exposed to the test substance supports a conclusion that aneugenic activity is not expressed in vivo. If there is no evidence of exposure to the bone marrow, a negative result is viewed as inconclusive and further studies are required. The liver micronucleus assay, even though not yet fully validated, can provide supporting information for substances that are aneugenic following metabolic activation. The gastrointestinal micronucleus test, conversely, to be further developed, may help to assess aneugenic potential at the initial site of contact for substances that are aneugenic in vitro without metabolic activation. Based on the evidence in relation to mechanisms of aneugenicity, the Scientific Committee concluded that, in principle, health-based guidance values can be established for substances that are aneugenic but not clastogenic nor causing gene mutations, provided that a comprehensive toxicological database is available. For situations in which the toxicological database is not sufficient to establish health-based guidance values, some approaches to risk assessment are proposed. The Scientific Committee recommends further development of the gastrointestinal micronucleus test, and research to improve the understanding of aneugenicity to support risk assessment.
AB - Abstract The EFSA Scientific Committee was asked to provide guidance on the most appropriate in vivo tests to follow up on positive in vitro results for aneugenicity, and on the approach to risk assessment for substances that are aneugenic but not clastogenic nor causing gene mutations. The Scientific Committee confirmed that the preferred approach is to perform an in vivo mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test with a relevant route of administration. If this is positive, it demonstrates that the substance is aneugenic in vivo. A negative result with evidence that the bone marrow is exposed to the test substance supports a conclusion that aneugenic activity is not expressed in vivo. If there is no evidence of exposure to the bone marrow, a negative result is viewed as inconclusive and further studies are required. The liver micronucleus assay, even though not yet fully validated, can provide supporting information for substances that are aneugenic following metabolic activation. The gastrointestinal micronucleus test, conversely, to be further developed, may help to assess aneugenic potential at the initial site of contact for substances that are aneugenic in vitro without metabolic activation. Based on the evidence in relation to mechanisms of aneugenicity, the Scientific Committee concluded that, in principle, health-based guidance values can be established for substances that are aneugenic but not clastogenic nor causing gene mutations, provided that a comprehensive toxicological database is available. For situations in which the toxicological database is not sufficient to establish health-based guidance values, some approaches to risk assessment are proposed. The Scientific Committee recommends further development of the gastrointestinal micronucleus test, and research to improve the understanding of aneugenicity to support risk assessment.
KW - aneugenicity
KW - micronucleus test
KW - genotoxicity in vivo and in vitro
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6770
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6770
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34386097
VL - 19
SP - 1
EP - 27
JO - E F S A Journal
JF - E F S A Journal
SN - 1831-4732
IS - 8
M1 - e06770
ER -
ID: 275766020