Since March 2021, Germany has been providing cost-free severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen tests, and many day-to-day activities following the lockdown have required negative test results. Yet it remains unclear how tests have been used and whether there are patterns connected to mitigation measures. We analyzed over 50,000 anonymized records from eight test centers in a typical medium-sized city, with one of them remaining open continuously from March until December 2021. The centers exhibit distinct patterns of visitor types, with the majority tested only once in the investigated period. Individuals who underwent repeated testing tended to favor the same location. A preference for spontaneous testing grew in proportion to the availability of spare tests. Visitors aged 18 to 30 years were distinctly overrepresented compared to the local demographic. A negative binominal model showed that implemented mitigation measures had an impact on the number of tests conducted. Cost-free testing in private facilities was implemented into the German complementary screening strategy, aiming to achieve weekly population-wide testing. This study demonstrates these facilities were rarely used for regular testing but rather for meeting requirements of certified tests. The results should aid authorities in making future decisions regarding infection control.