Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology: veterinary (STROBE-Vet) statement

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology : veterinary (STROBE-Vet) statement. / Sargeant, J. M.; O'connor, A. M.; Dohoo, I. R.; Erb, H. N.; Cevallos, M.; Egger, M.; Ersbøll, A. K.; Martin, S. W.; Nielsen, Liza Rosenbaum; Pearl, D. L.; Pfeiffer, D. U.; Sanchez, J.; Torrence, M. E.; Vigre, H.; Waldner, C.; Ward, M. P.

In: Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 79, No. 12, 12.2016, p. 2211-2219.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Sargeant, JM, O'connor, AM, Dohoo, IR, Erb, HN, Cevallos, M, Egger, M, Ersbøll, AK, Martin, SW, Nielsen, LR, Pearl, DL, Pfeiffer, DU, Sanchez, J, Torrence, ME, Vigre, H, Waldner, C & Ward, MP 2016, 'Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology: veterinary (STROBE-Vet) statement', Journal of Food Protection, vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 2211-2219. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-016

APA

Sargeant, J. M., O'connor, A. M., Dohoo, I. R., Erb, H. N., Cevallos, M., Egger, M., Ersbøll, A. K., Martin, S. W., Nielsen, L. R., Pearl, D. L., Pfeiffer, D. U., Sanchez, J., Torrence, M. E., Vigre, H., Waldner, C., & Ward, M. P. (2016). Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology: veterinary (STROBE-Vet) statement. Journal of Food Protection, 79(12), 2211-2219. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-016

Vancouver

Sargeant JM, O'connor AM, Dohoo IR, Erb HN, Cevallos M, Egger M et al. Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology: veterinary (STROBE-Vet) statement. Journal of Food Protection. 2016 Dec;79(12):2211-2219. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-016

Author

Sargeant, J. M. ; O'connor, A. M. ; Dohoo, I. R. ; Erb, H. N. ; Cevallos, M. ; Egger, M. ; Ersbøll, A. K. ; Martin, S. W. ; Nielsen, Liza Rosenbaum ; Pearl, D. L. ; Pfeiffer, D. U. ; Sanchez, J. ; Torrence, M. E. ; Vigre, H. ; Waldner, C. ; Ward, M. P. / Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology : veterinary (STROBE-Vet) statement. In: Journal of Food Protection. 2016 ; Vol. 79, No. 12. pp. 2211-2219.

Bibtex

@article{d4164fcca58c46729364dfb966bab433,
title = "Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology: veterinary (STROBE-Vet) statement",
abstract = "Reporting of observational studies in veterinary research presents challenges that often are not addressed in published reporting guidelines. Our objective was to develop an extension of the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) statement that addresses unique reporting requirements for observational studies in veterinary medicine related to health, production, welfare, and food safety. We conducted a consensus meeting with 17 experts in Mississauga, Canada. Experts completed a premeeting survey about whether items in the STROBE statement should be modified or added to address unique issues related to observational studies in animal species with health, production, welfare, or food safety outcomes. During the meeting, each STROBE item was discussed to determine whether or not rewording was recommended, and whether additions were warranted. Anonymous voting was used to determine consensus. Six items required no modifications or additions. Modifications or additions were made to the STROBE items 1 (title and abstract), 3 (objectives), 5 (setting), 6 (participants), 7 (variables), 8 (data sources and measurement), 9 (bias), 10 (study size), 12 (statistical methods), 13 (participants), 14 (descriptive data), 15 (outcome data), 16 (main results), 17 (other analyses), 19 (limitations), and 22 (funding). The methods and processes used were similar to those used for other extensions of the STROBE statement. The use of this STROBE statement extension should improve reporting of observational studies in veterinary research by recognizing unique features of observational studies involving food-producing and companion animals, products of animal origin, aquaculture, and wildlife.",
author = "Sargeant, {J. M.} and O'connor, {A. M.} and Dohoo, {I. R.} and Erb, {H. N.} and M. Cevallos and M. Egger and Ersb{\o}ll, {A. K.} and Martin, {S. W.} and Nielsen, {Liza Rosenbaum} and Pearl, {D. L.} and Pfeiffer, {D. U.} and J. Sanchez and Torrence, {M. E.} and H. Vigre and C. Waldner and Ward, {M. P.}",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
doi = "10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-016",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "2211--2219",
journal = "Journal of Food Protection",
issn = "0362-028X",
publisher = "International Association for Food Protection",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology

T2 - veterinary (STROBE-Vet) statement

AU - Sargeant, J. M.

AU - O'connor, A. M.

AU - Dohoo, I. R.

AU - Erb, H. N.

AU - Cevallos, M.

AU - Egger, M.

AU - Ersbøll, A. K.

AU - Martin, S. W.

AU - Nielsen, Liza Rosenbaum

AU - Pearl, D. L.

AU - Pfeiffer, D. U.

AU - Sanchez, J.

AU - Torrence, M. E.

AU - Vigre, H.

AU - Waldner, C.

AU - Ward, M. P.

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - Reporting of observational studies in veterinary research presents challenges that often are not addressed in published reporting guidelines. Our objective was to develop an extension of the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) statement that addresses unique reporting requirements for observational studies in veterinary medicine related to health, production, welfare, and food safety. We conducted a consensus meeting with 17 experts in Mississauga, Canada. Experts completed a premeeting survey about whether items in the STROBE statement should be modified or added to address unique issues related to observational studies in animal species with health, production, welfare, or food safety outcomes. During the meeting, each STROBE item was discussed to determine whether or not rewording was recommended, and whether additions were warranted. Anonymous voting was used to determine consensus. Six items required no modifications or additions. Modifications or additions were made to the STROBE items 1 (title and abstract), 3 (objectives), 5 (setting), 6 (participants), 7 (variables), 8 (data sources and measurement), 9 (bias), 10 (study size), 12 (statistical methods), 13 (participants), 14 (descriptive data), 15 (outcome data), 16 (main results), 17 (other analyses), 19 (limitations), and 22 (funding). The methods and processes used were similar to those used for other extensions of the STROBE statement. The use of this STROBE statement extension should improve reporting of observational studies in veterinary research by recognizing unique features of observational studies involving food-producing and companion animals, products of animal origin, aquaculture, and wildlife.

AB - Reporting of observational studies in veterinary research presents challenges that often are not addressed in published reporting guidelines. Our objective was to develop an extension of the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) statement that addresses unique reporting requirements for observational studies in veterinary medicine related to health, production, welfare, and food safety. We conducted a consensus meeting with 17 experts in Mississauga, Canada. Experts completed a premeeting survey about whether items in the STROBE statement should be modified or added to address unique issues related to observational studies in animal species with health, production, welfare, or food safety outcomes. During the meeting, each STROBE item was discussed to determine whether or not rewording was recommended, and whether additions were warranted. Anonymous voting was used to determine consensus. Six items required no modifications or additions. Modifications or additions were made to the STROBE items 1 (title and abstract), 3 (objectives), 5 (setting), 6 (participants), 7 (variables), 8 (data sources and measurement), 9 (bias), 10 (study size), 12 (statistical methods), 13 (participants), 14 (descriptive data), 15 (outcome data), 16 (main results), 17 (other analyses), 19 (limitations), and 22 (funding). The methods and processes used were similar to those used for other extensions of the STROBE statement. The use of this STROBE statement extension should improve reporting of observational studies in veterinary research by recognizing unique features of observational studies involving food-producing and companion animals, products of animal origin, aquaculture, and wildlife.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84998636545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-016

DO - 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-016

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28221964

AN - SCOPUS:84998636545

VL - 79

SP - 2211

EP - 2219

JO - Journal of Food Protection

JF - Journal of Food Protection

SN - 0362-028X

IS - 12

ER -

ID: 169977679