Opinion on the impact of non-monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research
Standard
Opinion on the impact of non-monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments. / EFSA Scientific Committee; More, Simon John; Benford, Diane; Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne; Bampidis, Vasileios; Bragard, Claude; Halldorsson, Thorhallur I; Hernández-Jerez, Antonio F; Koutsoumanis, Kostas P; Lambré, Claude; Machera, Kyriaki; Mullins, Ewen; Nielsen, Søren Saxmose; Schlatter, Josef Rudolf; Schrenk, Dieter; Turck, Dominique; Tarazona, Jose; Younes, Maged.
In: EFSA Journal, Vol. 19, No. 10, e06877, 21.10.2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Opinion on the impact of non-monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments
AU - EFSA Scientific Committee, null
AU - More, Simon John
AU - Benford, Diane
AU - Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne
AU - Bampidis, Vasileios
AU - Bragard, Claude
AU - Halldorsson, Thorhallur I
AU - Hernández-Jerez, Antonio F
AU - Koutsoumanis, Kostas P
AU - Lambré, Claude
AU - Machera, Kyriaki
AU - Mullins, Ewen
AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
AU - Schlatter, Josef Rudolf
AU - Schrenk, Dieter
AU - Turck, Dominique
AU - Tarazona, Jose
AU - Younes, Maged
N1 - © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
PY - 2021/10/21
Y1 - 2021/10/21
N2 - Abstract This Opinion assesses the biological relevance of the non-monotonic dose responses (NMDR) identified in a previous EFSA External Report (Beausoleil et al., 2016) produced under GP/EFSA/SCER/2014/01 and the follow-up probabilistic assessment (Chevillotte et al., 2017a,b), focusing on the in vivo data sets fulfilling most of the checkpoints of the visual/statistical-based analysis identified in Beausoleil et al. (2016). The evaluation was completed with cases discussed in EFSA assessments and the update of the scientific literature. Observations of NMDR were confirmed in certain studies and are particularly relevant for receptor-mediated effects. Based on the results of the evaluation, the Opinion proposes an approach to be applied during the risk assessment process when apparent non-monotonicity is observed, also providing advice on specific elements to be considered to facilitate the assessment of NMDR in EFSA risk assessments. The proposed approach was applied to two case studies, Bisphenol A and bis(2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and these evaluations are reported in dedicated annexes. Considering the potential impact of NMDRs in regulatory risk assessment, the Scientific Committee recommends a concerted international effort on developing internationally agreed guidance and harmonised frameworks for identifying and addressing NMDRs in the risk assessment process.
AB - Abstract This Opinion assesses the biological relevance of the non-monotonic dose responses (NMDR) identified in a previous EFSA External Report (Beausoleil et al., 2016) produced under GP/EFSA/SCER/2014/01 and the follow-up probabilistic assessment (Chevillotte et al., 2017a,b), focusing on the in vivo data sets fulfilling most of the checkpoints of the visual/statistical-based analysis identified in Beausoleil et al. (2016). The evaluation was completed with cases discussed in EFSA assessments and the update of the scientific literature. Observations of NMDR were confirmed in certain studies and are particularly relevant for receptor-mediated effects. Based on the results of the evaluation, the Opinion proposes an approach to be applied during the risk assessment process when apparent non-monotonicity is observed, also providing advice on specific elements to be considered to facilitate the assessment of NMDR in EFSA risk assessments. The proposed approach was applied to two case studies, Bisphenol A and bis(2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and these evaluations are reported in dedicated annexes. Considering the potential impact of NMDRs in regulatory risk assessment, the Scientific Committee recommends a concerted international effort on developing internationally agreed guidance and harmonised frameworks for identifying and addressing NMDRs in the risk assessment process.
KW - non-monotonic dose response (NMDR)
KW - statistical analysis
KW - probabilistic analysis
KW - biological relevance
KW - reference dose
KW - human health risk assessment
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6877
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6877
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34712366
VL - 19
JO - E F S A Journal
JF - E F S A Journal
SN - 1831-4732
IS - 10
M1 - e06877
ER -
ID: 282263845