Perceptions of the rabbit as a low investment ‘starter pet’ lead to negative impacts on its welfare: Results of two Danish surveys

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Perceptions of the rabbit as a low investment ‘starter pet’ lead to negative impacts on its welfare : Results of two Danish surveys. / Skovlund, Cecilie Ravn; Forkman, Björn; Lund, Thomas Bøker; Mistry, Belinda Glumsøe ; Nielsen, Søren Saxmose; Sandøe, Peter.

In: Animal Welfare, Vol. 32, e45, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Skovlund, CR, Forkman, B, Lund, TB, Mistry, BG, Nielsen, SS & Sandøe, P 2023, 'Perceptions of the rabbit as a low investment ‘starter pet’ lead to negative impacts on its welfare: Results of two Danish surveys', Animal Welfare, vol. 32, e45. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2023.41

APA

Skovlund, C. R., Forkman, B., Lund, T. B., Mistry, B. G., Nielsen, S. S., & Sandøe, P. (2023). Perceptions of the rabbit as a low investment ‘starter pet’ lead to negative impacts on its welfare: Results of two Danish surveys. Animal Welfare, 32, [e45]. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2023.41

Vancouver

Skovlund CR, Forkman B, Lund TB, Mistry BG, Nielsen SS, Sandøe P. Perceptions of the rabbit as a low investment ‘starter pet’ lead to negative impacts on its welfare: Results of two Danish surveys. Animal Welfare. 2023;32. e45. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2023.41

Author

Skovlund, Cecilie Ravn ; Forkman, Björn ; Lund, Thomas Bøker ; Mistry, Belinda Glumsøe ; Nielsen, Søren Saxmose ; Sandøe, Peter. / Perceptions of the rabbit as a low investment ‘starter pet’ lead to negative impacts on its welfare : Results of two Danish surveys. In: Animal Welfare. 2023 ; Vol. 32.

Bibtex

@article{40c55dd033bd4ac28198ebd8157d6ded,
title = "Perceptions of the rabbit as a low investment {\textquoteleft}starter pet{\textquoteright} lead to negative impacts on its welfare: Results of two Danish surveys",
abstract = "Concerns over compromised companion rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus domesticus) welfare are widespread. The welfare problems have been linked to the perception of rabbits as low investment {\textquoteleft}children{\textquoteright}s pets.{\textquoteright} To test this hypothesis and investigate the current conditions for rabbits, data were gathered from two surveys in 2021: a nationally representative survey of Danish companion animal owners (Survey I) and a detailed social media-based survey of Danish rabbit owners (Survey II). Using logistic regression, three owner-related variables (whether a child/adult was responsible for care of the rabbit, owner-opinion on rabbits{\textquoteright} suitability as {\textquoteleft}starter pets{\textquoteright} and willingness-to-pay [WTP] for veterinary treatment) were employed to investigate the effect of rabbit status on owner-provision of selected husbandry conditions. The 76 (Survey I) and 4,335 (Survey II) responses suggested that most rabbits are acquired for children and are solitarily housed, and that many are kept in cages of an unsuitable size and not checked daily. Owners who perceived rabbits as {\textquoteleft}starter pets{\textquoteright} and with lower WTP were more likely to house rabbits in restricted space and to not provide continuous gnawing opportunities, ad libitum hay or routine healthcare. A child fulfilling the role of the rabbit{\textquoteright}s main caretaker was also associated with inadequate housing type and fewer gnawing opportunities. Thus, many rabbits live in unsuitable conditions, and owners who perceive rabbits as low investment {\textquoteleft}children{\textquoteright}s pets{\textquoteright} are more likely to not provide recommended resources. Changing owners{\textquoteright} perceptions of rabbits and promoting suitable husbandry through official education programmes and minimum requirements is important if there are to be improvements made to rabbit welfare.",
author = "Skovlund, {Cecilie Ravn} and Bj{\"o}rn Forkman and Lund, {Thomas B{\o}ker} and Mistry, {Belinda Glums{\o}e} and Nielsen, {S{\o}ren Saxmose} and Peter Sand{\o}e",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1017/awf.2023.41",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
journal = "Animal Welfare",
issn = "0962-7286",
publisher = "Universities Federation for Animal Welfare",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of the rabbit as a low investment ‘starter pet’ lead to negative impacts on its welfare

T2 - Results of two Danish surveys

AU - Skovlund, Cecilie Ravn

AU - Forkman, Björn

AU - Lund, Thomas Bøker

AU - Mistry, Belinda Glumsøe

AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose

AU - Sandøe, Peter

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Concerns over compromised companion rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus domesticus) welfare are widespread. The welfare problems have been linked to the perception of rabbits as low investment ‘children’s pets.’ To test this hypothesis and investigate the current conditions for rabbits, data were gathered from two surveys in 2021: a nationally representative survey of Danish companion animal owners (Survey I) and a detailed social media-based survey of Danish rabbit owners (Survey II). Using logistic regression, three owner-related variables (whether a child/adult was responsible for care of the rabbit, owner-opinion on rabbits’ suitability as ‘starter pets’ and willingness-to-pay [WTP] for veterinary treatment) were employed to investigate the effect of rabbit status on owner-provision of selected husbandry conditions. The 76 (Survey I) and 4,335 (Survey II) responses suggested that most rabbits are acquired for children and are solitarily housed, and that many are kept in cages of an unsuitable size and not checked daily. Owners who perceived rabbits as ‘starter pets’ and with lower WTP were more likely to house rabbits in restricted space and to not provide continuous gnawing opportunities, ad libitum hay or routine healthcare. A child fulfilling the role of the rabbit’s main caretaker was also associated with inadequate housing type and fewer gnawing opportunities. Thus, many rabbits live in unsuitable conditions, and owners who perceive rabbits as low investment ‘children’s pets’ are more likely to not provide recommended resources. Changing owners’ perceptions of rabbits and promoting suitable husbandry through official education programmes and minimum requirements is important if there are to be improvements made to rabbit welfare.

AB - Concerns over compromised companion rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus domesticus) welfare are widespread. The welfare problems have been linked to the perception of rabbits as low investment ‘children’s pets.’ To test this hypothesis and investigate the current conditions for rabbits, data were gathered from two surveys in 2021: a nationally representative survey of Danish companion animal owners (Survey I) and a detailed social media-based survey of Danish rabbit owners (Survey II). Using logistic regression, three owner-related variables (whether a child/adult was responsible for care of the rabbit, owner-opinion on rabbits’ suitability as ‘starter pets’ and willingness-to-pay [WTP] for veterinary treatment) were employed to investigate the effect of rabbit status on owner-provision of selected husbandry conditions. The 76 (Survey I) and 4,335 (Survey II) responses suggested that most rabbits are acquired for children and are solitarily housed, and that many are kept in cages of an unsuitable size and not checked daily. Owners who perceived rabbits as ‘starter pets’ and with lower WTP were more likely to house rabbits in restricted space and to not provide continuous gnawing opportunities, ad libitum hay or routine healthcare. A child fulfilling the role of the rabbit’s main caretaker was also associated with inadequate housing type and fewer gnawing opportunities. Thus, many rabbits live in unsuitable conditions, and owners who perceive rabbits as low investment ‘children’s pets’ are more likely to not provide recommended resources. Changing owners’ perceptions of rabbits and promoting suitable husbandry through official education programmes and minimum requirements is important if there are to be improvements made to rabbit welfare.

U2 - 10.1017/awf.2023.41

DO - 10.1017/awf.2023.41

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38487438

VL - 32

JO - Animal Welfare

JF - Animal Welfare

SN - 0962-7286

M1 - e45

ER -

ID: 359861121