Vector-borne diseases

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

Documents

  • Simon J. More
  • Dominique Bicout
  • Anette Bøtner
  • Andrew Butterworth
  • Paolo Calistri
  • Aline De Koeijer
  • Klaus Depner
  • Sandra Edwards
  • Bruno Garin-Bastuji
  • Margaret Good
  • Christian Gortazar Schmidt
  • Virginie Michel
  • Miguel Angel Miranda
  • Mohan Raj
  • Liisa Sihvonen
  • Hans Spoolder
  • Hans-Hermann Thulke
  • Antonio Velarde
  • Preben Willeberg
  • Christoph Winckler
  • Andrea Bau
  • Beatriz Beltran-Beck
  • Edoardo Carnesecchi
  • Pascal Casier
  • Ewelina Czwienczek
  • Sofie Dhollander
  • Marios Georgiadis
  • Andrey Gogin
  • Luca Pasinato
  • Jane Richardson
  • Francesca Riolo
  • Gianluca Rossi
  • Matthew Watts
  • Eliana Lima
  • Jan Arend Stegeman
After a request from the Europea n Commission, EFSA’s Panel on Animal Health and Welfaresummarised the main characteristics of 36 vector-borne disease s (VBDs) in 36 web-based storymaps.The risk of introduction in the EU through movement of livestock or pets was assessed for eac h of the36 VBDs individually, using a semiquantitative Metho d to INTegrate all relevant RISK aspects(MINTRI SK model), which was further modified to a European scale into the EFSA-VBD-RISK-m odel .Only eight of the 36 VBD-agents had an overall rate of introduction in the EU (being the combinationof the rate of entry, vector transmission and establishment) which was estimated to be above 0.001introductions per year. These were Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus, bluetongue virus, WestNile virus, Schmallenberg virus, Hepatozoon canis, Leishmania infantum, Bunyamwera virus andHighlands J. virus. For these eight dise ases, the annual extent of spread was assessed, assuming theimplementation of available, authorised prevention and control measures in the EU. Further, theprobability of overwintering was assessed, as well as the possible impact of the VBDs on public health,animal health and farm production. For the other 28 VBD-agents for which the rate of introduction wasestimated to be very low, no further asse ssments were made. Due to the uncertainty related to someparameters used for the risk assessment or the instable or unpredictability disease situation in some ofthe source regions, it is recommended to update the assessment when new information becomesavailable. Since this risk assessment was carried out for large regions in the EU for many VBD-agents,it should be considered as a first screening. If a more detailed risk assessment for a specificVBDiswished for on a national or subnational level, the EFSA-VBD-RISK-model is freely available for thispurpose.
Original languageEnglish
Article number4793
JournalE F S A Journal
Volume15
Issue number5
Number of pages91
ISSN1831-4732
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 178742251