Nonpharmacological Interventions to Reduce Sedation and General Anesthesia in Pediatric MRI: A Meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Nonpharmacological Interventions to Reduce Sedation and General Anesthesia in Pediatric MRI : A Meta-analysis. / Thestrup, Jakob; Hybschmann, Jane; Madsen, Thurid W; Bork, Nanna E; Sørensen, Jette L; Afshari, Arash; Borgwardt, Lise; Berntsen, Marianne; Born, Alfred Peter; Aunsholt, Lise; Larsen, Vibeke A; Gjærde, Line K.

In: Hospital pediatrics, Vol. 13, No. 10, 2023, p. e301-e313.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Thestrup, J, Hybschmann, J, Madsen, TW, Bork, NE, Sørensen, JL, Afshari, A, Borgwardt, L, Berntsen, M, Born, AP, Aunsholt, L, Larsen, VA & Gjærde, LK 2023, 'Nonpharmacological Interventions to Reduce Sedation and General Anesthesia in Pediatric MRI: A Meta-analysis', Hospital pediatrics, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. e301-e313. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2023-007289

APA

Thestrup, J., Hybschmann, J., Madsen, T. W., Bork, N. E., Sørensen, J. L., Afshari, A., Borgwardt, L., Berntsen, M., Born, A. P., Aunsholt, L., Larsen, V. A., & Gjærde, L. K. (2023). Nonpharmacological Interventions to Reduce Sedation and General Anesthesia in Pediatric MRI: A Meta-analysis. Hospital pediatrics, 13(10), e301-e313. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2023-007289

Vancouver

Thestrup J, Hybschmann J, Madsen TW, Bork NE, Sørensen JL, Afshari A et al. Nonpharmacological Interventions to Reduce Sedation and General Anesthesia in Pediatric MRI: A Meta-analysis. Hospital pediatrics. 2023;13(10):e301-e313. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2023-007289

Author

Thestrup, Jakob ; Hybschmann, Jane ; Madsen, Thurid W ; Bork, Nanna E ; Sørensen, Jette L ; Afshari, Arash ; Borgwardt, Lise ; Berntsen, Marianne ; Born, Alfred Peter ; Aunsholt, Lise ; Larsen, Vibeke A ; Gjærde, Line K. / Nonpharmacological Interventions to Reduce Sedation and General Anesthesia in Pediatric MRI : A Meta-analysis. In: Hospital pediatrics. 2023 ; Vol. 13, No. 10. pp. e301-e313.

Bibtex

@article{cc493d4e64194797b19aa5480b8669fb,
title = "Nonpharmacological Interventions to Reduce Sedation and General Anesthesia in Pediatric MRI: A Meta-analysis",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Nonpharmacological strategies are increasingly used in pediatric procedures, but in pediatric MRI, sedation and general anesthesia are still commonly required.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in reducing use of sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing MRI, and to investigate effects on scan time, image quality, and anxiety.DATA SOURCES: We searched Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception through October 10, 2022.STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs comparing the effect of a nonpharmacological intervention with standard care on use of sedation or general anesthesia, scan time, image quality, or child and parental anxiety among infants (<2 years), children, and adolescents (2-18 years) undergoing MRI.DATA EXTRACTION: Standardized instruments were used to extract data and assess study quality.RESULTS: Forty-six studies were eligible for the systematic review. Limited to studies on children and adolescents, the meta-analysis included 20 studies with 33 873 patients. Intervention versus comparator analysis showed that nonpharmacological interventions were associated with reduced need for sedation and general anesthesia in the randomized control trials (risk ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.95; l2 = 35%) and nonrandomized studies (risk ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.66; l2 = 91%). The effect was largest among children aged 3 to 10 years when compared with older children and adolescents aged 11 to 18 years.LIMITATIONS: There was substantial heterogeneity among nonrandomized studies.CONCLUSIONS: Nonpharmacological interventions must be considered as standard procedure in infants, children, and adolescents undergoing MRI.",
author = "Jakob Thestrup and Jane Hybschmann and Madsen, {Thurid W} and Bork, {Nanna E} and S{\o}rensen, {Jette L} and Arash Afshari and Lise Borgwardt and Marianne Berntsen and Born, {Alfred Peter} and Lise Aunsholt and Larsen, {Vibeke A} and Gj{\ae}rde, {Line K}",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1542/hpeds.2023-007289",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "e301--e313",
journal = "Hospital pediatrics",
issn = "2154-1671",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonpharmacological Interventions to Reduce Sedation and General Anesthesia in Pediatric MRI

T2 - A Meta-analysis

AU - Thestrup, Jakob

AU - Hybschmann, Jane

AU - Madsen, Thurid W

AU - Bork, Nanna E

AU - Sørensen, Jette L

AU - Afshari, Arash

AU - Borgwardt, Lise

AU - Berntsen, Marianne

AU - Born, Alfred Peter

AU - Aunsholt, Lise

AU - Larsen, Vibeke A

AU - Gjærde, Line K

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - CONTEXT: Nonpharmacological strategies are increasingly used in pediatric procedures, but in pediatric MRI, sedation and general anesthesia are still commonly required.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in reducing use of sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing MRI, and to investigate effects on scan time, image quality, and anxiety.DATA SOURCES: We searched Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception through October 10, 2022.STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs comparing the effect of a nonpharmacological intervention with standard care on use of sedation or general anesthesia, scan time, image quality, or child and parental anxiety among infants (<2 years), children, and adolescents (2-18 years) undergoing MRI.DATA EXTRACTION: Standardized instruments were used to extract data and assess study quality.RESULTS: Forty-six studies were eligible for the systematic review. Limited to studies on children and adolescents, the meta-analysis included 20 studies with 33 873 patients. Intervention versus comparator analysis showed that nonpharmacological interventions were associated with reduced need for sedation and general anesthesia in the randomized control trials (risk ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.95; l2 = 35%) and nonrandomized studies (risk ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.66; l2 = 91%). The effect was largest among children aged 3 to 10 years when compared with older children and adolescents aged 11 to 18 years.LIMITATIONS: There was substantial heterogeneity among nonrandomized studies.CONCLUSIONS: Nonpharmacological interventions must be considered as standard procedure in infants, children, and adolescents undergoing MRI.

AB - CONTEXT: Nonpharmacological strategies are increasingly used in pediatric procedures, but in pediatric MRI, sedation and general anesthesia are still commonly required.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in reducing use of sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing MRI, and to investigate effects on scan time, image quality, and anxiety.DATA SOURCES: We searched Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception through October 10, 2022.STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs comparing the effect of a nonpharmacological intervention with standard care on use of sedation or general anesthesia, scan time, image quality, or child and parental anxiety among infants (<2 years), children, and adolescents (2-18 years) undergoing MRI.DATA EXTRACTION: Standardized instruments were used to extract data and assess study quality.RESULTS: Forty-six studies were eligible for the systematic review. Limited to studies on children and adolescents, the meta-analysis included 20 studies with 33 873 patients. Intervention versus comparator analysis showed that nonpharmacological interventions were associated with reduced need for sedation and general anesthesia in the randomized control trials (risk ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.95; l2 = 35%) and nonrandomized studies (risk ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.66; l2 = 91%). The effect was largest among children aged 3 to 10 years when compared with older children and adolescents aged 11 to 18 years.LIMITATIONS: There was substantial heterogeneity among nonrandomized studies.CONCLUSIONS: Nonpharmacological interventions must be considered as standard procedure in infants, children, and adolescents undergoing MRI.

U2 - 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007289

DO - 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007289

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37727937

VL - 13

SP - e301-e313

JO - Hospital pediatrics

JF - Hospital pediatrics

SN - 2154-1671

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 370697787