TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of astaxanthin-rich Phaffia rhodozyma for salmon and trout (Igene Biotechnology, Inc.)

AU - Bampidis, Vasileios

AU - Azimonti, Giovanna

AU - Bastos, Maria de Lourdes

AU - Christensen, Henrik

AU - Dusemund, Birgit

AU - Fašmon Durjava, Mojca

AU - Kouba, Maryline

AU - López-Alonso, Marta

AU - López Puente, Secundino

AU - Marcon, Francesca

AU - Mayo, Baltasar

AU - Pechová, Alena

AU - Petkova, Mariana

AU - Ramos, Fernando

AU - Sanz, Yolanda

AU - Villa, Roberto Edoardo

AU - Woutersen, Ruud

AU - Galobart, Jaume

AU - Holcznecht, Orsolya

AU - Vettori, Maria Vittoria

AU - EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Following a request from the European Commission, the FEEDAP Panel was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of astaxanthin (ATX)-rich Phaffia rhodozyma. The additive, belonging to the category ‘sensory additives’ and the functional group ‘substances which, when fed to animals, add colours to food of animal origin’ is intended to be used in feed for salmon and trout from an age of six months onwards up to a maximum content of 100 mg ATX/kg complete feed. The product is produced by the telemorph of Phaffia rhodozyma, Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous, and it is declared to contain 995 g dried inactivated biomass and 5 g ascorbic acid per kg additive. The main active principle of the additive is ATX; however, the FEEDAP Panel noted that some other carotenoids are also present in lower quantities. The minimum ATX concentration is specified to be 5,000 mg per kg additive. The yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment; therefore, the use of the production strain in the production of the additive would not raise any safety concern for the target species, the consumers of products from animals fed the additive and the environment. In the absence of a tolerance study with the additive, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the safety for the target species. In the absence of residue and toxicity data of ATX, no final conclusions on the safety for the consumer can be drawn. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is irritant to skin and eyes, and a skin and respiratory sensitiser, although exposure by inhalation is likely low. The FEEDAP Panel considers that ATX from the biomass does not pose a significant additional risk to the environment compared with other natural sources of ATX. In absence of adequate evidence, no conclusion can be made on the efficacy of the additive.

AB - Following a request from the European Commission, the FEEDAP Panel was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of astaxanthin (ATX)-rich Phaffia rhodozyma. The additive, belonging to the category ‘sensory additives’ and the functional group ‘substances which, when fed to animals, add colours to food of animal origin’ is intended to be used in feed for salmon and trout from an age of six months onwards up to a maximum content of 100 mg ATX/kg complete feed. The product is produced by the telemorph of Phaffia rhodozyma, Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous, and it is declared to contain 995 g dried inactivated biomass and 5 g ascorbic acid per kg additive. The main active principle of the additive is ATX; however, the FEEDAP Panel noted that some other carotenoids are also present in lower quantities. The minimum ATX concentration is specified to be 5,000 mg per kg additive. The yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment; therefore, the use of the production strain in the production of the additive would not raise any safety concern for the target species, the consumers of products from animals fed the additive and the environment. In the absence of a tolerance study with the additive, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the safety for the target species. In the absence of residue and toxicity data of ATX, no final conclusions on the safety for the consumer can be drawn. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is irritant to skin and eyes, and a skin and respiratory sensitiser, although exposure by inhalation is likely low. The FEEDAP Panel considers that ATX from the biomass does not pose a significant additional risk to the environment compared with other natural sources of ATX. In absence of adequate evidence, no conclusion can be made on the efficacy of the additive.

KW - astaxanthin

KW - colourant

KW - efficacy

KW - Phaffia rhodozyma

KW - safety

KW - salmon

KW - sensory additive

KW - trout

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7161

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7161

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35233255

AN - SCOPUS:85127021702

VL - 20

JO - E F S A Journal

JF - E F S A Journal

SN - 1831-4732

IS - 2

M1 - e07161

ER -