Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of astaxanthin-rich Phaffia rhodozyma for salmon and trout (Igene Biotechnology, Inc.)

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 1.52 MB, PDF document

  • EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)

Following a request from the European Commission, the FEEDAP Panel was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of astaxanthin (ATX)-rich Phaffia rhodozyma. The additive, belonging to the category ‘sensory additives’ and the functional group ‘substances which, when fed to animals, add colours to food of animal origin’ is intended to be used in feed for salmon and trout from an age of six months onwards up to a maximum content of 100 mg ATX/kg complete feed. The product is produced by the telemorph of Phaffia rhodozyma, Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous, and it is declared to contain 995 g dried inactivated biomass and 5 g ascorbic acid per kg additive. The main active principle of the additive is ATX; however, the FEEDAP Panel noted that some other carotenoids are also present in lower quantities. The minimum ATX concentration is specified to be 5,000 mg per kg additive. The yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment; therefore, the use of the production strain in the production of the additive would not raise any safety concern for the target species, the consumers of products from animals fed the additive and the environment. In the absence of a tolerance study with the additive, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the safety for the target species. In the absence of residue and toxicity data of ATX, no final conclusions on the safety for the consumer can be drawn. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is irritant to skin and eyes, and a skin and respiratory sensitiser, although exposure by inhalation is likely low. The FEEDAP Panel considers that ATX from the biomass does not pose a significant additional risk to the environment compared with other natural sources of ATX. In absence of adequate evidence, no conclusion can be made on the efficacy of the additive.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere07161
JournalEFSA Journal
Volume20
Issue number2
ISSN1831-4732
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.

    Research areas

  • astaxanthin, colourant, efficacy, Phaffia rhodozyma, safety, salmon, sensory additive, trout

ID: 320357972