Administration of glucose at litter equalization as a strategy to increase energy in intrauterine growth restricted piglets

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Administration of glucose at litter equalization as a strategy to increase energy in intrauterine growth restricted piglets. / Klaaborg, Joanna; Amdi, Charlotte.

I: Animals, Bind 10, Nr. 7, 1221, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Klaaborg, J & Amdi, C 2020, 'Administration of glucose at litter equalization as a strategy to increase energy in intrauterine growth restricted piglets', Animals, bind 10, nr. 7, 1221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071221

APA

Klaaborg, J., & Amdi, C. (2020). Administration of glucose at litter equalization as a strategy to increase energy in intrauterine growth restricted piglets. Animals, 10(7), [1221]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071221

Vancouver

Klaaborg J, Amdi C. Administration of glucose at litter equalization as a strategy to increase energy in intrauterine growth restricted piglets. Animals. 2020;10(7). 1221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071221

Author

Klaaborg, Joanna ; Amdi, Charlotte. / Administration of glucose at litter equalization as a strategy to increase energy in intrauterine growth restricted piglets. I: Animals. 2020 ; Bind 10, Nr. 7.

Bibtex

@article{fa0590f39ab246f991edf82e74bb3a9a,
title = "Administration of glucose at litter equalization as a strategy to increase energy in intrauterine growth restricted piglets",
abstract = "Hyper-prolific sows give birth to large litters and up to 25% of piglets born have been subjected to intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). The aim of this study was to test whether an oral administration of glucose impacts the survival rate and body weight gain of IUGR piglets at weaning. Different methods (injection versus oral administration of glucose 6 mL or 12 mL, respectively) were tested on IUGR piglets at litter equalization (i.e., when piglets are handled the first time at 5–20 h after birth). Injecting glucose generated the highest whole blood glucose level + 3 h after treatment, however, after this no differences were observed. Of the 237 IUGR piglets studied, 98 piglets died or were removed from the nurse sow (41%). Rectal temperature at litter equalization (0 h) was related to the survival of the piglets with an average temperature of 37.1 ± 0.1 °C in surviving piglets and 36.6 ± 0.1 °C in piglets that died. In conclusion, providing these extra management actions at litter equalization is too late to help piglets that have a low rectal temperature and are low on energy. More research investigating different management methods to deal with IUGR piglets are needed as many of these underdeveloped piglets will not survive.",
keywords = "Glucose administration, Hyper-prolific sows, Intrauterine growth restriction, Piglet survival, Rectal temperature",
author = "Joanna Klaaborg and Charlotte Amdi",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.3390/ani10071221",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Animals",
issn = "2076-2615",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Administration of glucose at litter equalization as a strategy to increase energy in intrauterine growth restricted piglets

AU - Klaaborg, Joanna

AU - Amdi, Charlotte

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Hyper-prolific sows give birth to large litters and up to 25% of piglets born have been subjected to intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). The aim of this study was to test whether an oral administration of glucose impacts the survival rate and body weight gain of IUGR piglets at weaning. Different methods (injection versus oral administration of glucose 6 mL or 12 mL, respectively) were tested on IUGR piglets at litter equalization (i.e., when piglets are handled the first time at 5–20 h after birth). Injecting glucose generated the highest whole blood glucose level + 3 h after treatment, however, after this no differences were observed. Of the 237 IUGR piglets studied, 98 piglets died or were removed from the nurse sow (41%). Rectal temperature at litter equalization (0 h) was related to the survival of the piglets with an average temperature of 37.1 ± 0.1 °C in surviving piglets and 36.6 ± 0.1 °C in piglets that died. In conclusion, providing these extra management actions at litter equalization is too late to help piglets that have a low rectal temperature and are low on energy. More research investigating different management methods to deal with IUGR piglets are needed as many of these underdeveloped piglets will not survive.

AB - Hyper-prolific sows give birth to large litters and up to 25% of piglets born have been subjected to intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). The aim of this study was to test whether an oral administration of glucose impacts the survival rate and body weight gain of IUGR piglets at weaning. Different methods (injection versus oral administration of glucose 6 mL or 12 mL, respectively) were tested on IUGR piglets at litter equalization (i.e., when piglets are handled the first time at 5–20 h after birth). Injecting glucose generated the highest whole blood glucose level + 3 h after treatment, however, after this no differences were observed. Of the 237 IUGR piglets studied, 98 piglets died or were removed from the nurse sow (41%). Rectal temperature at litter equalization (0 h) was related to the survival of the piglets with an average temperature of 37.1 ± 0.1 °C in surviving piglets and 36.6 ± 0.1 °C in piglets that died. In conclusion, providing these extra management actions at litter equalization is too late to help piglets that have a low rectal temperature and are low on energy. More research investigating different management methods to deal with IUGR piglets are needed as many of these underdeveloped piglets will not survive.

KW - Glucose administration

KW - Hyper-prolific sows

KW - Intrauterine growth restriction

KW - Piglet survival

KW - Rectal temperature

U2 - 10.3390/ani10071221

DO - 10.3390/ani10071221

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32709098

AN - SCOPUS:85088587695

VL - 10

JO - Animals

JF - Animals

SN - 2076-2615

IS - 7

M1 - 1221

ER -

ID: 247546623