A quantitative assessment method for Ascaris eggs on hands

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

A quantitative assessment method for Ascaris eggs on hands. / Jeandron, Aurelie; Ensink, Jeroen H. J.; Thamsborg, Stig Milan; Dalsgaard, Anders; Sengupta, Mita Eva.

I: PLOS ONE, Bind 9, Nr. 5, e96731, 2014.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jeandron, A, Ensink, JHJ, Thamsborg, SM, Dalsgaard, A & Sengupta, ME 2014, 'A quantitative assessment method for Ascaris eggs on hands', PLOS ONE, bind 9, nr. 5, e96731. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096731

APA

Jeandron, A., Ensink, J. H. J., Thamsborg, S. M., Dalsgaard, A., & Sengupta, M. E. (2014). A quantitative assessment method for Ascaris eggs on hands. PLOS ONE, 9(5), [e96731]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096731

Vancouver

Jeandron A, Ensink JHJ, Thamsborg SM, Dalsgaard A, Sengupta ME. A quantitative assessment method for Ascaris eggs on hands. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(5). e96731. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096731

Author

Jeandron, Aurelie ; Ensink, Jeroen H. J. ; Thamsborg, Stig Milan ; Dalsgaard, Anders ; Sengupta, Mita Eva. / A quantitative assessment method for Ascaris eggs on hands. I: PLOS ONE. 2014 ; Bind 9, Nr. 5.

Bibtex

@article{bea2d9abda1e4f168187a70f055df2ac,
title = "A quantitative assessment method for Ascaris eggs on hands",
abstract = "The importance of hands in the transmission of soil transmitted helminths, especially Ascaris and Trichuris infections, is under-researched. This is partly because of the absence of a reliable method to quantify the number of eggs on hands. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a method to assess the number of Ascaris eggs on hands and determine the egg recovery rate of the method. Under laboratory conditions, hands were seeded with a known number of Ascaris eggs, air dried and washed in a plastic bag retaining the washing water, in order to determine recovery rates of eggs for four different detergents (cationic [benzethonium chloride 0.1% and cetylpyridinium chloride CPC 0.1%], anionic [7X 1% - quadrafos, glycol ether, and dioctyl sulfoccinate sodium salt] and non-ionic [Tween80 0.1% -polyethylene glycol sorbitan monooleate]) and two egg detection methods (McMaster technique and FLOTAC). A modified concentration McMaster technique showed the highest egg recovery rate from bags. Two of the four diluted detergents (benzethonium chloride 0.1% and 7X 1%) also showed a higher egg recovery rate and were then compared with de-ionized water for recovery of helminth eggs from hands. The highest recovery rate (95.6%) was achieved with a hand rinse performed with 7X 1%. Washing hands with de-ionized water resulted in an egg recovery rate of 82.7%. This washing method performed with a low concentration of detergent offers potential for quantitative investigation of contamination of hands with Ascaris eggs and of their role in human infection. Follow-up studies are needed that validate the hand washing method under field conditions, e.g. including people of different age, lower levels of contamination and various levels of hand cleanliness.",
author = "Aurelie Jeandron and Ensink, {Jeroen H. J.} and Thamsborg, {Stig Milan} and Anders Dalsgaard and Sengupta, {Mita Eva}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0096731",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A quantitative assessment method for Ascaris eggs on hands

AU - Jeandron, Aurelie

AU - Ensink, Jeroen H. J.

AU - Thamsborg, Stig Milan

AU - Dalsgaard, Anders

AU - Sengupta, Mita Eva

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The importance of hands in the transmission of soil transmitted helminths, especially Ascaris and Trichuris infections, is under-researched. This is partly because of the absence of a reliable method to quantify the number of eggs on hands. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a method to assess the number of Ascaris eggs on hands and determine the egg recovery rate of the method. Under laboratory conditions, hands were seeded with a known number of Ascaris eggs, air dried and washed in a plastic bag retaining the washing water, in order to determine recovery rates of eggs for four different detergents (cationic [benzethonium chloride 0.1% and cetylpyridinium chloride CPC 0.1%], anionic [7X 1% - quadrafos, glycol ether, and dioctyl sulfoccinate sodium salt] and non-ionic [Tween80 0.1% -polyethylene glycol sorbitan monooleate]) and two egg detection methods (McMaster technique and FLOTAC). A modified concentration McMaster technique showed the highest egg recovery rate from bags. Two of the four diluted detergents (benzethonium chloride 0.1% and 7X 1%) also showed a higher egg recovery rate and were then compared with de-ionized water for recovery of helminth eggs from hands. The highest recovery rate (95.6%) was achieved with a hand rinse performed with 7X 1%. Washing hands with de-ionized water resulted in an egg recovery rate of 82.7%. This washing method performed with a low concentration of detergent offers potential for quantitative investigation of contamination of hands with Ascaris eggs and of their role in human infection. Follow-up studies are needed that validate the hand washing method under field conditions, e.g. including people of different age, lower levels of contamination and various levels of hand cleanliness.

AB - The importance of hands in the transmission of soil transmitted helminths, especially Ascaris and Trichuris infections, is under-researched. This is partly because of the absence of a reliable method to quantify the number of eggs on hands. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a method to assess the number of Ascaris eggs on hands and determine the egg recovery rate of the method. Under laboratory conditions, hands were seeded with a known number of Ascaris eggs, air dried and washed in a plastic bag retaining the washing water, in order to determine recovery rates of eggs for four different detergents (cationic [benzethonium chloride 0.1% and cetylpyridinium chloride CPC 0.1%], anionic [7X 1% - quadrafos, glycol ether, and dioctyl sulfoccinate sodium salt] and non-ionic [Tween80 0.1% -polyethylene glycol sorbitan monooleate]) and two egg detection methods (McMaster technique and FLOTAC). A modified concentration McMaster technique showed the highest egg recovery rate from bags. Two of the four diluted detergents (benzethonium chloride 0.1% and 7X 1%) also showed a higher egg recovery rate and were then compared with de-ionized water for recovery of helminth eggs from hands. The highest recovery rate (95.6%) was achieved with a hand rinse performed with 7X 1%. Washing hands with de-ionized water resulted in an egg recovery rate of 82.7%. This washing method performed with a low concentration of detergent offers potential for quantitative investigation of contamination of hands with Ascaris eggs and of their role in human infection. Follow-up studies are needed that validate the hand washing method under field conditions, e.g. including people of different age, lower levels of contamination and various levels of hand cleanliness.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0096731

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0096731

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24802859

VL - 9

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 5

M1 - e96731

ER -

ID: 123673674