Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells. / Chandrasekaran, Abinaya; Avci, Hasan; Ochalek, Anna; Rosingh, Lone ; Molnar, Kinga; Laszlo, Lajos; Bellak, Tamas; Teglasi, Annamaria; Pesti, Krisztina ; Mike, Arpad; Phanthong, Phetcharat; Biro, Orsolya; Hall, Vanessa Jane; Kitiyanant, Narisorn; Krause, Karl-Heinz; Kobolak, Julianna; Dinnyés, András.

I: Stem Cell Research, Bind 25, 2017, s. 139-151.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Chandrasekaran, A, Avci, H, Ochalek, A, Rosingh, L, Molnar, K, Laszlo, L, Bellak, T, Teglasi, A, Pesti, K, Mike, A, Phanthong, P, Biro, O, Hall, VJ, Kitiyanant, N, Krause, K-H, Kobolak, J & Dinnyés, A 2017, 'Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells', Stem Cell Research, bind 25, s. 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2017.10.010

APA

Chandrasekaran, A., Avci, H., Ochalek, A., Rosingh, L., Molnar, K., Laszlo, L., Bellak, T., Teglasi, A., Pesti, K., Mike, A., Phanthong, P., Biro, O., Hall, V. J., Kitiyanant, N., Krause, K-H., Kobolak, J., & Dinnyés, A. (2017). Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Research, 25, 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2017.10.010

Vancouver

Chandrasekaran A, Avci H, Ochalek A, Rosingh L, Molnar K, Laszlo L o.a. Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Research. 2017;25:139-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2017.10.010

Author

Chandrasekaran, Abinaya ; Avci, Hasan ; Ochalek, Anna ; Rosingh, Lone ; Molnar, Kinga ; Laszlo, Lajos ; Bellak, Tamas ; Teglasi, Annamaria ; Pesti, Krisztina ; Mike, Arpad ; Phanthong, Phetcharat ; Biro, Orsolya ; Hall, Vanessa Jane ; Kitiyanant, Narisorn ; Krause, Karl-Heinz ; Kobolak, Julianna ; Dinnyés, András. / Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells. I: Stem Cell Research. 2017 ; Bind 25. s. 139-151.

Bibtex

@article{6d4970af1e8e466481d42fcb83128ddc,
title = "Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells",
abstract = "Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are frequently induced using 3D culture methodologies however, it is unknown whether spheroid-based (3D) neural induction is actually superior to monolayer (2D) neural induction. Our aim was to compare the efficiency of 2D induction with 3D induction method in their ability to generate NPCs, and subsequently neurons and astrocytes. Neural differentiation was analysed at the protein level qualitatively by immunocytochemistry and quantitatively by flow cytometry for NPC (SOX1, PAX6, NESTIN), neuronal (MAP2, TUBB3), cortical layer (TBR1, CUX1) and glial markers (SOX9, GFAP, AQP4). Electron microscopy demonstrated that both methods resulted in morphologically similar neural rosettes. However, quantification of NPCs derived from 3D neural induction exhibited an increase in the number of PAX6/NESTIN double positive cells and the derived neurons exhibited longer neurites. In contrast, 2D neural induction resulted in more SOX1 positive cells. While 2D monolayer induction resulted in slightly less mature neurons, at an early stage of differentiation, the patch clamp analysis failed to reveal any significant differences between the electrophysiological properties between the two induction methods. In conclusion, 3D neural induction increases the yield of PAX6+/NESTIN+ cells and gives rise to neurons with longer neurites, which might be an advantage for the production of forebrain cortical neurons, highlighting the potential of 3D neural induction, independent of iPSCs' genetic background.",
author = "Abinaya Chandrasekaran and Hasan Avci and Anna Ochalek and Lone Rosingh and Kinga Molnar and Lajos Laszlo and Tamas Bellak and Annamaria Teglasi and Krisztina Pesti and Arpad Mike and Phetcharat Phanthong and Orsolya Biro and Hall, {Vanessa Jane} and Narisorn Kitiyanant and Karl-Heinz Krause and Julianna Kobolak and Andr{\'a}s Dinny{\'e}s",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.scr.2017.10.010",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "139--151",
journal = "Stem Cell Research",
issn = "1873-5061",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells

AU - Chandrasekaran, Abinaya

AU - Avci, Hasan

AU - Ochalek, Anna

AU - Rosingh, Lone

AU - Molnar, Kinga

AU - Laszlo, Lajos

AU - Bellak, Tamas

AU - Teglasi, Annamaria

AU - Pesti, Krisztina

AU - Mike, Arpad

AU - Phanthong, Phetcharat

AU - Biro, Orsolya

AU - Hall, Vanessa Jane

AU - Kitiyanant, Narisorn

AU - Krause, Karl-Heinz

AU - Kobolak, Julianna

AU - Dinnyés, András

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are frequently induced using 3D culture methodologies however, it is unknown whether spheroid-based (3D) neural induction is actually superior to monolayer (2D) neural induction. Our aim was to compare the efficiency of 2D induction with 3D induction method in their ability to generate NPCs, and subsequently neurons and astrocytes. Neural differentiation was analysed at the protein level qualitatively by immunocytochemistry and quantitatively by flow cytometry for NPC (SOX1, PAX6, NESTIN), neuronal (MAP2, TUBB3), cortical layer (TBR1, CUX1) and glial markers (SOX9, GFAP, AQP4). Electron microscopy demonstrated that both methods resulted in morphologically similar neural rosettes. However, quantification of NPCs derived from 3D neural induction exhibited an increase in the number of PAX6/NESTIN double positive cells and the derived neurons exhibited longer neurites. In contrast, 2D neural induction resulted in more SOX1 positive cells. While 2D monolayer induction resulted in slightly less mature neurons, at an early stage of differentiation, the patch clamp analysis failed to reveal any significant differences between the electrophysiological properties between the two induction methods. In conclusion, 3D neural induction increases the yield of PAX6+/NESTIN+ cells and gives rise to neurons with longer neurites, which might be an advantage for the production of forebrain cortical neurons, highlighting the potential of 3D neural induction, independent of iPSCs' genetic background.

AB - Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are frequently induced using 3D culture methodologies however, it is unknown whether spheroid-based (3D) neural induction is actually superior to monolayer (2D) neural induction. Our aim was to compare the efficiency of 2D induction with 3D induction method in their ability to generate NPCs, and subsequently neurons and astrocytes. Neural differentiation was analysed at the protein level qualitatively by immunocytochemistry and quantitatively by flow cytometry for NPC (SOX1, PAX6, NESTIN), neuronal (MAP2, TUBB3), cortical layer (TBR1, CUX1) and glial markers (SOX9, GFAP, AQP4). Electron microscopy demonstrated that both methods resulted in morphologically similar neural rosettes. However, quantification of NPCs derived from 3D neural induction exhibited an increase in the number of PAX6/NESTIN double positive cells and the derived neurons exhibited longer neurites. In contrast, 2D neural induction resulted in more SOX1 positive cells. While 2D monolayer induction resulted in slightly less mature neurons, at an early stage of differentiation, the patch clamp analysis failed to reveal any significant differences between the electrophysiological properties between the two induction methods. In conclusion, 3D neural induction increases the yield of PAX6+/NESTIN+ cells and gives rise to neurons with longer neurites, which might be an advantage for the production of forebrain cortical neurons, highlighting the potential of 3D neural induction, independent of iPSCs' genetic background.

U2 - 10.1016/j.scr.2017.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.scr.2017.10.010

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29128818

VL - 25

SP - 139

EP - 151

JO - Stem Cell Research

JF - Stem Cell Research

SN - 1873-5061

ER -

ID: 184536847