Dietary fat stimulates development of NAFLD more potently than dietary fructose in Sprague-Dawley rats

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Dietary fat stimulates development of NAFLD more potently than dietary fructose in Sprague-Dawley rats. / Jensen, Victoria Svop; Hvid, Henning; Damgaard, Jesper; Nygaard, Helle; Ingvorsen, Camilla; Wulff, Erik Max; Lykkesfeldt, Jens; Fledelius, Christian.

I: Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome, Bind 10, 4, 2018.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jensen, VS, Hvid, H, Damgaard, J, Nygaard, H, Ingvorsen, C, Wulff, EM, Lykkesfeldt, J & Fledelius, C 2018, 'Dietary fat stimulates development of NAFLD more potently than dietary fructose in Sprague-Dawley rats', Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome, bind 10, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-018-0307-8

APA

Jensen, V. S., Hvid, H., Damgaard, J., Nygaard, H., Ingvorsen, C., Wulff, E. M., Lykkesfeldt, J., & Fledelius, C. (2018). Dietary fat stimulates development of NAFLD more potently than dietary fructose in Sprague-Dawley rats. Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome, 10, [4]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-018-0307-8

Vancouver

Jensen VS, Hvid H, Damgaard J, Nygaard H, Ingvorsen C, Wulff EM o.a. Dietary fat stimulates development of NAFLD more potently than dietary fructose in Sprague-Dawley rats. Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome. 2018;10. 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-018-0307-8

Author

Jensen, Victoria Svop ; Hvid, Henning ; Damgaard, Jesper ; Nygaard, Helle ; Ingvorsen, Camilla ; Wulff, Erik Max ; Lykkesfeldt, Jens ; Fledelius, Christian. / Dietary fat stimulates development of NAFLD more potently than dietary fructose in Sprague-Dawley rats. I: Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome. 2018 ; Bind 10.

Bibtex

@article{bf65877683e34a2b80d384d6a07eb1f1,
title = "Dietary fat stimulates development of NAFLD more potently than dietary fructose in Sprague-Dawley rats",
abstract = "Background: In humans and animal models, excessive intake of dietary fat, fructose and cholesterol has been linked to the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the individual roles of the dietary components remain unclear. To investigate this further, we compared the effects of a high-fat diet, a high-fructose diet and a combination diet with added cholesterol on the development of NAFLD in rats. Methods: Forty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into four groups receiving either a control-diet (Control: 10% fat); a high-fat diet (HFD: 60% fat, 20% carbohydrate), a high-fructose diet [HFr: 10% fat, 70% carbohydrate (mainly fructose)] or a high-fat/high-fructose/high-cholesterol-diet (NASH: 40% fat, 40% carbohydrate (mainly fructose), 2% cholesterol) for 16 weeks. Results: After 16 weeks, liver histology revealed extensive steatosis and inflammation in both NASH- and HFD-fed rats, while hepatic changes in HFr-rats were much more subtle. These findings were corroborated by significantly elevated hepatic triglyceride content in both NASH- (p < 0.01) and HFD-fed rats (p < 0.0001), elevated hepatic cholesterol levels in NASH-fed rats (p < 0.0001), but no changes in HFr-fed rats, compared to Control. On the contrary, only HFr-fed rats developed dyslipidemia as characterized by higher levels of plasma triglycerides compared to all other groups (p < 0.0001). Hepatic dysfunction and inflammation was confirmed in HFD-fed rats by elevated levels of hepatic MCP-1 (p < 0.0001), TNF-alpha (p < 0.001) and plasma β-hydroxybutyrate (p < 0.0001), and in NASH-fed rats by elevated levels of hepatic MCP-1 (p < 0.01), increased hepatic macrophage infiltration (p < 0.001), and higher plasma levels of alanine aminotransferase (p < 0.0001) aspartate aminotransferase (p < 0.05), haptoglobin (p < 0.001) and TIMP-1 (p < 0.01) compared to Control. Conclusion: These findings show that dietary fat and cholesterol are the primary drivers of NAFLD development and progression in rats, while fructose mostly exerts its effect on the circulating lipid pool.",
keywords = "Animal models, Cholesterol, Diet, Fat, Fructose, NAFLD, NASH, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, Rat",
author = "Jensen, {Victoria Svop} and Henning Hvid and Jesper Damgaard and Helle Nygaard and Camilla Ingvorsen and Wulff, {Erik Max} and Jens Lykkesfeldt and Christian Fledelius",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1186/s13098-018-0307-8",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome",
issn = "1758-5996",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dietary fat stimulates development of NAFLD more potently than dietary fructose in Sprague-Dawley rats

AU - Jensen, Victoria Svop

AU - Hvid, Henning

AU - Damgaard, Jesper

AU - Nygaard, Helle

AU - Ingvorsen, Camilla

AU - Wulff, Erik Max

AU - Lykkesfeldt, Jens

AU - Fledelius, Christian

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Background: In humans and animal models, excessive intake of dietary fat, fructose and cholesterol has been linked to the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the individual roles of the dietary components remain unclear. To investigate this further, we compared the effects of a high-fat diet, a high-fructose diet and a combination diet with added cholesterol on the development of NAFLD in rats. Methods: Forty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into four groups receiving either a control-diet (Control: 10% fat); a high-fat diet (HFD: 60% fat, 20% carbohydrate), a high-fructose diet [HFr: 10% fat, 70% carbohydrate (mainly fructose)] or a high-fat/high-fructose/high-cholesterol-diet (NASH: 40% fat, 40% carbohydrate (mainly fructose), 2% cholesterol) for 16 weeks. Results: After 16 weeks, liver histology revealed extensive steatosis and inflammation in both NASH- and HFD-fed rats, while hepatic changes in HFr-rats were much more subtle. These findings were corroborated by significantly elevated hepatic triglyceride content in both NASH- (p < 0.01) and HFD-fed rats (p < 0.0001), elevated hepatic cholesterol levels in NASH-fed rats (p < 0.0001), but no changes in HFr-fed rats, compared to Control. On the contrary, only HFr-fed rats developed dyslipidemia as characterized by higher levels of plasma triglycerides compared to all other groups (p < 0.0001). Hepatic dysfunction and inflammation was confirmed in HFD-fed rats by elevated levels of hepatic MCP-1 (p < 0.0001), TNF-alpha (p < 0.001) and plasma β-hydroxybutyrate (p < 0.0001), and in NASH-fed rats by elevated levels of hepatic MCP-1 (p < 0.01), increased hepatic macrophage infiltration (p < 0.001), and higher plasma levels of alanine aminotransferase (p < 0.0001) aspartate aminotransferase (p < 0.05), haptoglobin (p < 0.001) and TIMP-1 (p < 0.01) compared to Control. Conclusion: These findings show that dietary fat and cholesterol are the primary drivers of NAFLD development and progression in rats, while fructose mostly exerts its effect on the circulating lipid pool.

AB - Background: In humans and animal models, excessive intake of dietary fat, fructose and cholesterol has been linked to the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the individual roles of the dietary components remain unclear. To investigate this further, we compared the effects of a high-fat diet, a high-fructose diet and a combination diet with added cholesterol on the development of NAFLD in rats. Methods: Forty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into four groups receiving either a control-diet (Control: 10% fat); a high-fat diet (HFD: 60% fat, 20% carbohydrate), a high-fructose diet [HFr: 10% fat, 70% carbohydrate (mainly fructose)] or a high-fat/high-fructose/high-cholesterol-diet (NASH: 40% fat, 40% carbohydrate (mainly fructose), 2% cholesterol) for 16 weeks. Results: After 16 weeks, liver histology revealed extensive steatosis and inflammation in both NASH- and HFD-fed rats, while hepatic changes in HFr-rats were much more subtle. These findings were corroborated by significantly elevated hepatic triglyceride content in both NASH- (p < 0.01) and HFD-fed rats (p < 0.0001), elevated hepatic cholesterol levels in NASH-fed rats (p < 0.0001), but no changes in HFr-fed rats, compared to Control. On the contrary, only HFr-fed rats developed dyslipidemia as characterized by higher levels of plasma triglycerides compared to all other groups (p < 0.0001). Hepatic dysfunction and inflammation was confirmed in HFD-fed rats by elevated levels of hepatic MCP-1 (p < 0.0001), TNF-alpha (p < 0.001) and plasma β-hydroxybutyrate (p < 0.0001), and in NASH-fed rats by elevated levels of hepatic MCP-1 (p < 0.01), increased hepatic macrophage infiltration (p < 0.001), and higher plasma levels of alanine aminotransferase (p < 0.0001) aspartate aminotransferase (p < 0.05), haptoglobin (p < 0.001) and TIMP-1 (p < 0.01) compared to Control. Conclusion: These findings show that dietary fat and cholesterol are the primary drivers of NAFLD development and progression in rats, while fructose mostly exerts its effect on the circulating lipid pool.

KW - Animal models

KW - Cholesterol

KW - Diet

KW - Fat

KW - Fructose

KW - NAFLD

KW - NASH

KW - Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

KW - Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

KW - Rat

U2 - 10.1186/s13098-018-0307-8

DO - 10.1186/s13098-018-0307-8

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29410708

AN - SCOPUS:85043515507

VL - 10

JO - Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome

JF - Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome

SN - 1758-5996

M1 - 4

ER -

ID: 203052290