Kan et frivilligt samleje være strafbart? – Overvejelser om viljens nye betydning for gerningsindholdet i voldtægtsbestemmelsen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Kan et frivilligt samleje være strafbart? – Overvejelser om viljens nye betydning for gerningsindholdet i voldtægtsbestemmelsen. / Holm, Clara Sofia Juul.

I: Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, Bind 108, Nr. 2, 13.09.2021, s. 343-359.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Holm, CSJ 2021, 'Kan et frivilligt samleje være strafbart? – Overvejelser om viljens nye betydning for gerningsindholdet i voldtægtsbestemmelsen', Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, bind 108, nr. 2, s. 343-359. https://doi.org/10.7146/ntfk.v108i2.128531

APA

Holm, C. S. J. (2021). Kan et frivilligt samleje være strafbart? – Overvejelser om viljens nye betydning for gerningsindholdet i voldtægtsbestemmelsen. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 108(2), 343-359. https://doi.org/10.7146/ntfk.v108i2.128531

Vancouver

Holm CSJ. Kan et frivilligt samleje være strafbart? – Overvejelser om viljens nye betydning for gerningsindholdet i voldtægtsbestemmelsen. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab. 2021 sep. 13;108(2):343-359. https://doi.org/10.7146/ntfk.v108i2.128531

Author

Holm, Clara Sofia Juul. / Kan et frivilligt samleje være strafbart? – Overvejelser om viljens nye betydning for gerningsindholdet i voldtægtsbestemmelsen. I: Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab. 2021 ; Bind 108, Nr. 2. s. 343-359.

Bibtex

@article{3a177e8683424b6b95b4f7fdcde7d481,
title = "Kan et frivilligt samleje v{\ae}re strafbart?: – Overvejelser om viljens nye betydning for gerningsindholdet i voldt{\ae}gtsbestemmelsen",
abstract = "This article examines some conceptual challenges associated with the content and possible demarcation of the notions of consent and voluntariness in recent Danish legislation on rape. It is argued that free will or voluntariness, and the expression thereof, should be seen as occurrences on a spectrum, and that the expression of consent or free will is at least partially necessary if such subjective concepts are to be useful in a legal context. The paper examines some general implications of this for possible outcomes of case law. Uncertainties include what should be made of the use of the »presumptions« mentioned in the bill. Some implications for the evaluation of a defendant{\textquoteright}s mens rea are also touched upon. It is concluded that the Danish court enjoys a margin of discretion that allows it the ability to criminalise instances of intercourse even when they are not necessarily non-voluntary.",
keywords = "Det Juridiske Fakultet",
author = "Holm, {Clara Sofia Juul}",
note = "Voldt{\ae}gt, frivillighed, samtykke, fors{\ae}t, fri vilje",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
day = "13",
doi = "10.7146/ntfk.v108i2.128531",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "108",
pages = "343--359",
journal = "Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab",
issn = "0029-1528",
publisher = "Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kan et frivilligt samleje være strafbart?

T2 - – Overvejelser om viljens nye betydning for gerningsindholdet i voldtægtsbestemmelsen

AU - Holm, Clara Sofia Juul

N1 - Voldtægt, frivillighed, samtykke, forsæt, fri vilje

PY - 2021/9/13

Y1 - 2021/9/13

N2 - This article examines some conceptual challenges associated with the content and possible demarcation of the notions of consent and voluntariness in recent Danish legislation on rape. It is argued that free will or voluntariness, and the expression thereof, should be seen as occurrences on a spectrum, and that the expression of consent or free will is at least partially necessary if such subjective concepts are to be useful in a legal context. The paper examines some general implications of this for possible outcomes of case law. Uncertainties include what should be made of the use of the »presumptions« mentioned in the bill. Some implications for the evaluation of a defendant’s mens rea are also touched upon. It is concluded that the Danish court enjoys a margin of discretion that allows it the ability to criminalise instances of intercourse even when they are not necessarily non-voluntary.

AB - This article examines some conceptual challenges associated with the content and possible demarcation of the notions of consent and voluntariness in recent Danish legislation on rape. It is argued that free will or voluntariness, and the expression thereof, should be seen as occurrences on a spectrum, and that the expression of consent or free will is at least partially necessary if such subjective concepts are to be useful in a legal context. The paper examines some general implications of this for possible outcomes of case law. Uncertainties include what should be made of the use of the »presumptions« mentioned in the bill. Some implications for the evaluation of a defendant’s mens rea are also touched upon. It is concluded that the Danish court enjoys a margin of discretion that allows it the ability to criminalise instances of intercourse even when they are not necessarily non-voluntary.

KW - Det Juridiske Fakultet

U2 - 10.7146/ntfk.v108i2.128531

DO - 10.7146/ntfk.v108i2.128531

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 108

SP - 343

EP - 359

JO - Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab

JF - Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab

SN - 0029-1528

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 282746952