Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning

Standard

Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza. / EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Wlefare, ; Nielsen, Søren Saxmose; Alvarez, Julio; Bicout, Dominique Joseph; Calistri, Paolo; Depner, Klaus; Drewe, Julian Ashley; Garin-Bastuji, Bruno; Gonzales Rojas, José Luis; Schmidt, Christian Gortázar; Herskin, Mette; Michel, Virginie; Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel; Pasquali, Paolo; Roberts, Helen Clare; Sihvonen, Liisa Helena; Spoolder, Hans; Stahl, Karl; Calvo, Antonio Velarde; Viltrop, Arvo; Winckler, Christoph; De Clercq, Kris; Klement, Eyal; Stegeman, Jan Arend; Gubbins, Simon; Antoniou, Sotiria-Eleni; Broglia, Alessandro; Van der Stede, Yves; Zancanaro, Gabriele; Aznar, Inma.

I: EFSA Journal, Bind 19, Nr. 1, e06372, 2021, s. 1-78.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning

Harvard

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Wlefare, , Nielsen, SS, Alvarez, J, Bicout, DJ, Calistri, P, Depner, K, Drewe, JA, Garin-Bastuji, B, Gonzales Rojas, JL, Schmidt, CG, Herskin, M, Michel, V, Miranda Chueca, MÁ, Pasquali, P, Roberts, HC, Sihvonen, LH, Spoolder, H, Stahl, K, Calvo, AV, Viltrop, A, Winckler, C, De Clercq, K, Klement, E, Stegeman, JA, Gubbins, S, Antoniou, S-E, Broglia, A, Van der Stede, Y, Zancanaro, G & Aznar, I 2021, 'Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza', EFSA Journal, bind 19, nr. 1, e06372, s. 1-78. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6372

APA

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Wlefare, Nielsen, S. S., Alvarez, J., Bicout, D. J., Calistri, P., Depner, K., Drewe, J. A., Garin-Bastuji, B., Gonzales Rojas, J. L., Schmidt, C. G., Herskin, M., Michel, V., Miranda Chueca, M. Á., Pasquali, P., Roberts, H. C., Sihvonen, L. H., Spoolder, H., Stahl, K., Calvo, A. V., ... Aznar, I. (2021). Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza. EFSA Journal, 19(1), 1-78. [e06372]. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6372

Vancouver

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Wlefare , Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Depner K o.a. Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza. EFSA Journal. 2021;19(1):1-78. e06372. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6372

Author

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Wlefare, ; Nielsen, Søren Saxmose ; Alvarez, Julio ; Bicout, Dominique Joseph ; Calistri, Paolo ; Depner, Klaus ; Drewe, Julian Ashley ; Garin-Bastuji, Bruno ; Gonzales Rojas, José Luis ; Schmidt, Christian Gortázar ; Herskin, Mette ; Michel, Virginie ; Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel ; Pasquali, Paolo ; Roberts, Helen Clare ; Sihvonen, Liisa Helena ; Spoolder, Hans ; Stahl, Karl ; Calvo, Antonio Velarde ; Viltrop, Arvo ; Winckler, Christoph ; De Clercq, Kris ; Klement, Eyal ; Stegeman, Jan Arend ; Gubbins, Simon ; Antoniou, Sotiria-Eleni ; Broglia, Alessandro ; Van der Stede, Yves ; Zancanaro, Gabriele ; Aznar, Inma. / Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza. I: EFSA Journal. 2021 ; Bind 19, Nr. 1. s. 1-78.

Bibtex

@article{60a869e6f0fb4f04b82f995696c95d15,
title = "Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza",
abstract = "EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ({\textquoteleft}Animal Health Law{\textquoteright}). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the model used for the assessment of the laboratory sampling procedures for HPAI are presented here. Here, also, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, sampling procedures as described in the diagnostic manual for HPAI were considered efficient for gallinaceous poultry, whereas additional sampling is advised for Anseriformes. The monitoring period was assessed as effective, and it was demonstrated that the surveillance zone comprises 95 as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to HPAI.",
keywords = "Control measures, Avian Influenza, HPAI, sampling procedures, monitoring period, protection zone, surveillance zone",
author = "{EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Wlefare} and Nielsen, {S{\o}ren Saxmose} and Julio Alvarez and Bicout, {Dominique Joseph} and Paolo Calistri and Klaus Depner and Drewe, {Julian Ashley} and Bruno Garin-Bastuji and {Gonzales Rojas}, {Jos{\'e} Luis} and Schmidt, {Christian Gort{\'a}zar} and Mette Herskin and Virginie Michel and {Miranda Chueca}, {Miguel {\'A}ngel} and Paolo Pasquali and Roberts, {Helen Clare} and Sihvonen, {Liisa Helena} and Hans Spoolder and Karl Stahl and Calvo, {Antonio Velarde} and Arvo Viltrop and Christoph Winckler and {De Clercq}, Kris and Eyal Klement and Stegeman, {Jan Arend} and Simon Gubbins and Sotiria-Eleni Antoniou and Alessandro Broglia and {Van der Stede}, Yves and Gabriele Zancanaro and Inma Aznar",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6372",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1--78",
journal = "E F S A Journal",
issn = "1831-4732",
publisher = "European Food Safety Authority (E F S A)",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza

AU - EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Wlefare, null

AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose

AU - Alvarez, Julio

AU - Bicout, Dominique Joseph

AU - Calistri, Paolo

AU - Depner, Klaus

AU - Drewe, Julian Ashley

AU - Garin-Bastuji, Bruno

AU - Gonzales Rojas, José Luis

AU - Schmidt, Christian Gortázar

AU - Herskin, Mette

AU - Michel, Virginie

AU - Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel

AU - Pasquali, Paolo

AU - Roberts, Helen Clare

AU - Sihvonen, Liisa Helena

AU - Spoolder, Hans

AU - Stahl, Karl

AU - Calvo, Antonio Velarde

AU - Viltrop, Arvo

AU - Winckler, Christoph

AU - De Clercq, Kris

AU - Klement, Eyal

AU - Stegeman, Jan Arend

AU - Gubbins, Simon

AU - Antoniou, Sotiria-Eleni

AU - Broglia, Alessandro

AU - Van der Stede, Yves

AU - Zancanaro, Gabriele

AU - Aznar, Inma

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the model used for the assessment of the laboratory sampling procedures for HPAI are presented here. Here, also, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, sampling procedures as described in the diagnostic manual for HPAI were considered efficient for gallinaceous poultry, whereas additional sampling is advised for Anseriformes. The monitoring period was assessed as effective, and it was demonstrated that the surveillance zone comprises 95 as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to HPAI.

AB - EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the model used for the assessment of the laboratory sampling procedures for HPAI are presented here. Here, also, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, sampling procedures as described in the diagnostic manual for HPAI were considered efficient for gallinaceous poultry, whereas additional sampling is advised for Anseriformes. The monitoring period was assessed as effective, and it was demonstrated that the surveillance zone comprises 95 as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to HPAI.

KW - Control measures

KW - Avian Influenza

KW - HPAI

KW - sampling procedures

KW - monitoring period

KW - protection zone

KW - surveillance zone

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6372

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6372

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33488812

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 78

JO - E F S A Journal

JF - E F S A Journal

SN - 1831-4732

IS - 1

M1 - e06372

ER -

ID: 255679764