Transparency in decision-making processes governing hazardous activities

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Transparency in decision-making processes governing hazardous activities. / Rasmussen, Birgitte; Jensen, Karsten Klint; Sandøe, Peter.

I: International Journal of Technology Policy and Management, Bind 7, Nr. 4, 2007, s. 422-438.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Rasmussen, B, Jensen, KK & Sandøe, P 2007, 'Transparency in decision-making processes governing hazardous activities', International Journal of Technology Policy and Management, bind 7, nr. 4, s. 422-438. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2007.015173

APA

Rasmussen, B., Jensen, K. K., & Sandøe, P. (2007). Transparency in decision-making processes governing hazardous activities. International Journal of Technology Policy and Management, 7(4), 422-438. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2007.015173

Vancouver

Rasmussen B, Jensen KK, Sandøe P. Transparency in decision-making processes governing hazardous activities. International Journal of Technology Policy and Management. 2007;7(4):422-438. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2007.015173

Author

Rasmussen, Birgitte ; Jensen, Karsten Klint ; Sandøe, Peter. / Transparency in decision-making processes governing hazardous activities. I: International Journal of Technology Policy and Management. 2007 ; Bind 7, Nr. 4. s. 422-438.

Bibtex

@article{beda2e40a1c211ddb6ae000ea68e967b,
title = "Transparency in decision-making processes governing hazardous activities",
abstract = "Transparent decisions are decisions in which the decision maker clearly presents to others the normative and factual premises behind the conclusions and explains the reasoning leading from these premises to the conclusion. Transparency thus involves uncovering, describing, documenting and communicating all the argumentative steps in the line of reasoning. It also involves acknowledging the weighting of any evidence drawn upon in reaching the final decision. It is recommended that each decision should be accompanied by an audit trail describing the premises justifying it. Uncertainties should be presented in connection with each possible adverse effect to indicate alternative scenarios to the most likely risk characterisation together with an evaluation of the reliability of each of the alternative scenarios. It is recommended that times and places for dialogue and participation be established. Transparency in this sense demands new efforts from the authorities and scientific advisors.",
keywords = "Former LIFE faculty, transparency, value premises, factual premises, decision making, risk assessment, advisory processes",
author = "Birgitte Rasmussen and Jensen, {Karsten Klint} and Peter Sand{\o}e",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1504/IJTPM.2007.015173",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "422--438",
journal = "International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management",
issn = "1468-4322",
publisher = "Inderscience Publishers",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transparency in decision-making processes governing hazardous activities

AU - Rasmussen, Birgitte

AU - Jensen, Karsten Klint

AU - Sandøe, Peter

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Transparent decisions are decisions in which the decision maker clearly presents to others the normative and factual premises behind the conclusions and explains the reasoning leading from these premises to the conclusion. Transparency thus involves uncovering, describing, documenting and communicating all the argumentative steps in the line of reasoning. It also involves acknowledging the weighting of any evidence drawn upon in reaching the final decision. It is recommended that each decision should be accompanied by an audit trail describing the premises justifying it. Uncertainties should be presented in connection with each possible adverse effect to indicate alternative scenarios to the most likely risk characterisation together with an evaluation of the reliability of each of the alternative scenarios. It is recommended that times and places for dialogue and participation be established. Transparency in this sense demands new efforts from the authorities and scientific advisors.

AB - Transparent decisions are decisions in which the decision maker clearly presents to others the normative and factual premises behind the conclusions and explains the reasoning leading from these premises to the conclusion. Transparency thus involves uncovering, describing, documenting and communicating all the argumentative steps in the line of reasoning. It also involves acknowledging the weighting of any evidence drawn upon in reaching the final decision. It is recommended that each decision should be accompanied by an audit trail describing the premises justifying it. Uncertainties should be presented in connection with each possible adverse effect to indicate alternative scenarios to the most likely risk characterisation together with an evaluation of the reliability of each of the alternative scenarios. It is recommended that times and places for dialogue and participation be established. Transparency in this sense demands new efforts from the authorities and scientific advisors.

KW - Former LIFE faculty

KW - transparency

KW - value premises

KW - factual premises

KW - decision making

KW - risk assessment

KW - advisory processes

U2 - 10.1504/IJTPM.2007.015173

DO - 10.1504/IJTPM.2007.015173

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 422

EP - 438

JO - International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management

JF - International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management

SN - 1468-4322

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 8078854