Immersion vaccines against Yersinia ruckeri infection in rainbow trout: Comparative effects of strain differences

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Immersion vaccines against Yersinia ruckeri infection in rainbow trout : Comparative effects of strain differences. / He, Yang; Zhujin, Ding; Marana, Moonika H.; Dalsgaard, Inger; Jaafar, Rzgar; Mathiessen, Heidi; Karami, Asma M.; Kania, Per W.; Buchmann, Kurt.

I: Journal of Fish Diseases, Bind 44, Nr. 12, 2021, s. 1937-1950.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

He, Y, Zhujin, D, Marana, MH, Dalsgaard, I, Jaafar, R, Mathiessen, H, Karami, AM, Kania, PW & Buchmann, K 2021, 'Immersion vaccines against Yersinia ruckeri infection in rainbow trout: Comparative effects of strain differences', Journal of Fish Diseases, bind 44, nr. 12, s. 1937-1950. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13507

APA

He, Y., Zhujin, D., Marana, M. H., Dalsgaard, I., Jaafar, R., Mathiessen, H., Karami, A. M., Kania, P. W., & Buchmann, K. (2021). Immersion vaccines against Yersinia ruckeri infection in rainbow trout: Comparative effects of strain differences. Journal of Fish Diseases, 44(12), 1937-1950. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13507

Vancouver

He Y, Zhujin D, Marana MH, Dalsgaard I, Jaafar R, Mathiessen H o.a. Immersion vaccines against Yersinia ruckeri infection in rainbow trout: Comparative effects of strain differences. Journal of Fish Diseases. 2021;44(12):1937-1950. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13507

Author

He, Yang ; Zhujin, Ding ; Marana, Moonika H. ; Dalsgaard, Inger ; Jaafar, Rzgar ; Mathiessen, Heidi ; Karami, Asma M. ; Kania, Per W. ; Buchmann, Kurt. / Immersion vaccines against Yersinia ruckeri infection in rainbow trout : Comparative effects of strain differences. I: Journal of Fish Diseases. 2021 ; Bind 44, Nr. 12. s. 1937-1950.

Bibtex

@article{111115f71b3f4f53a76c4553462a97f8,
title = "Immersion vaccines against Yersinia ruckeri infection in rainbow trout: Comparative effects of strain differences",
abstract = "The protective effects of autogenous and commercial ERM immersion vaccines (bacterins based on Yersinia ruckeri, serotype O1, biotypes 1 and 2) for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were compared in order to evaluate whether the use of local pathogen strains for immunization can improve protection. In addition, the effect of the bacterin concentration was established for the commercial product. Following sublethal challenge of vaccinated and non-vaccinated control fish with live bacteria, we followed the bacterial count in the fish (gills, liver and spleen). The expression of genes encoding immune factors (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN-γ, MHCI, MHCII, CD4, CD8, TCRβ, IgM, IgT, IgD, cathelicidins 1 and 2, SAA and C3) and densities of immune cells in organs were recorded. Both vaccines conferred protection as judged from the reduced bacterial load in exposed fish. Innate immune genes were upregulated in all groups following bacterial challenge but significantly more in non-vaccinated naive fish in which densities of SAA-positive immune cells increased. Immunoglobulin genes were upregulated on day 5 post-challenge, and fish vaccinated with the high commercial bacterin dosage showed increased IgM levels by ELISA on day 14 post-challenge, reflecting that the vaccine dosage was correlated to protection. In conclusion, both vaccine types offered protection to rainbow trout when exposed to live Y. ruckeri and no significant difference between commercial and autogenous vaccines was established.",
author = "Yang He and Ding Zhujin and Marana, {Moonika H.} and Inger Dalsgaard and Rzgar Jaafar and Heidi Mathiessen and Karami, {Asma M.} and Kania, {Per W.} and Kurt Buchmann",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1111/jfd.13507",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1937--1950",
journal = "Journal of Fish Diseases",
issn = "0140-7775",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immersion vaccines against Yersinia ruckeri infection in rainbow trout

T2 - Comparative effects of strain differences

AU - He, Yang

AU - Zhujin, Ding

AU - Marana, Moonika H.

AU - Dalsgaard, Inger

AU - Jaafar, Rzgar

AU - Mathiessen, Heidi

AU - Karami, Asma M.

AU - Kania, Per W.

AU - Buchmann, Kurt

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The protective effects of autogenous and commercial ERM immersion vaccines (bacterins based on Yersinia ruckeri, serotype O1, biotypes 1 and 2) for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were compared in order to evaluate whether the use of local pathogen strains for immunization can improve protection. In addition, the effect of the bacterin concentration was established for the commercial product. Following sublethal challenge of vaccinated and non-vaccinated control fish with live bacteria, we followed the bacterial count in the fish (gills, liver and spleen). The expression of genes encoding immune factors (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN-γ, MHCI, MHCII, CD4, CD8, TCRβ, IgM, IgT, IgD, cathelicidins 1 and 2, SAA and C3) and densities of immune cells in organs were recorded. Both vaccines conferred protection as judged from the reduced bacterial load in exposed fish. Innate immune genes were upregulated in all groups following bacterial challenge but significantly more in non-vaccinated naive fish in which densities of SAA-positive immune cells increased. Immunoglobulin genes were upregulated on day 5 post-challenge, and fish vaccinated with the high commercial bacterin dosage showed increased IgM levels by ELISA on day 14 post-challenge, reflecting that the vaccine dosage was correlated to protection. In conclusion, both vaccine types offered protection to rainbow trout when exposed to live Y. ruckeri and no significant difference between commercial and autogenous vaccines was established.

AB - The protective effects of autogenous and commercial ERM immersion vaccines (bacterins based on Yersinia ruckeri, serotype O1, biotypes 1 and 2) for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were compared in order to evaluate whether the use of local pathogen strains for immunization can improve protection. In addition, the effect of the bacterin concentration was established for the commercial product. Following sublethal challenge of vaccinated and non-vaccinated control fish with live bacteria, we followed the bacterial count in the fish (gills, liver and spleen). The expression of genes encoding immune factors (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN-γ, MHCI, MHCII, CD4, CD8, TCRβ, IgM, IgT, IgD, cathelicidins 1 and 2, SAA and C3) and densities of immune cells in organs were recorded. Both vaccines conferred protection as judged from the reduced bacterial load in exposed fish. Innate immune genes were upregulated in all groups following bacterial challenge but significantly more in non-vaccinated naive fish in which densities of SAA-positive immune cells increased. Immunoglobulin genes were upregulated on day 5 post-challenge, and fish vaccinated with the high commercial bacterin dosage showed increased IgM levels by ELISA on day 14 post-challenge, reflecting that the vaccine dosage was correlated to protection. In conclusion, both vaccine types offered protection to rainbow trout when exposed to live Y. ruckeri and no significant difference between commercial and autogenous vaccines was established.

U2 - 10.1111/jfd.13507

DO - 10.1111/jfd.13507

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34392540

VL - 44

SP - 1937

EP - 1950

JO - Journal of Fish Diseases

JF - Journal of Fish Diseases

SN - 0140-7775

IS - 12

ER -

ID: 276219854