Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance. / Alban, Lis; Bordier, Marion; Häsler, Barbara; Collineau, Lucie; Tomassone, Laura; Bennani, Houda; Aenishaenslin, Cécile; Norström, Madelaine; Aragrande, Maurizio; Filippitzi, Maria Eleni; Moura, Pedro; Sandberg, Marianne.
I: Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Bind 10, 1107122, 2023.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance
AU - Alban, Lis
AU - Bordier, Marion
AU - Häsler, Barbara
AU - Collineau, Lucie
AU - Tomassone, Laura
AU - Bennani, Houda
AU - Aenishaenslin, Cécile
AU - Norström, Madelaine
AU - Aragrande, Maurizio
AU - Filippitzi, Maria Eleni
AU - Moura, Pedro
AU - Sandberg, Marianne
N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2023 Alban, Bordier, Häsler, Collineau, Tomassone, Bennani, Aenishaenslin, Norström, Aragrande, Filippitzi, Moura and Sandberg.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a goal for many countries. Integrated surveillance of antimicrobial use (AMU) and resistance is a prerequisite for effective risk mitigation. Regular evaluation of any surveillance is needed to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency. The question is how to evaluate specifically integrated surveillance for AMU and AMR. In an international network called CoEvalAMR, we have developed guidelines for selection of the most appropriate tools for such an evaluation. Moreover, we have assessed different evaluation tools as examples using a country case format and a methodology with a focus on the user's experience. This paper describes the updated methodology, which consists of a brief introduction to the case and to the tool separately. Moreover, there are 12 functional aspects and nine content themes which should be scored using a 4-tiered scale. Additionally, four Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) questions should be addressed. Results are illustrated using radar diagrams. An example of application of the updated methodology is given using the ECoSur evaluation tool. No tool can cover all evaluation aspects comprehensively in a user-friendly manner, so the choice of tool must be based upon the specific evaluation purpose. Moreover, adequate resources, time and training are needed to obtain useful outputs from the evaluation. Our updated methodology can be used by tool users to share their experience with available tools, and hereby assist other users in identifying the most suited tool for their evaluation purpose. Additionally, tool developers can get valuable information for further improvements of their tool.
AB - Tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a goal for many countries. Integrated surveillance of antimicrobial use (AMU) and resistance is a prerequisite for effective risk mitigation. Regular evaluation of any surveillance is needed to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency. The question is how to evaluate specifically integrated surveillance for AMU and AMR. In an international network called CoEvalAMR, we have developed guidelines for selection of the most appropriate tools for such an evaluation. Moreover, we have assessed different evaluation tools as examples using a country case format and a methodology with a focus on the user's experience. This paper describes the updated methodology, which consists of a brief introduction to the case and to the tool separately. Moreover, there are 12 functional aspects and nine content themes which should be scored using a 4-tiered scale. Additionally, four Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) questions should be addressed. Results are illustrated using radar diagrams. An example of application of the updated methodology is given using the ECoSur evaluation tool. No tool can cover all evaluation aspects comprehensively in a user-friendly manner, so the choice of tool must be based upon the specific evaluation purpose. Moreover, adequate resources, time and training are needed to obtain useful outputs from the evaluation. Our updated methodology can be used by tool users to share their experience with available tools, and hereby assist other users in identifying the most suited tool for their evaluation purpose. Additionally, tool developers can get valuable information for further improvements of their tool.
KW - antimicrobial resistance
KW - antimicrobial use
KW - evaluation
KW - integrated surveillance
KW - One Health assessment
U2 - 10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122
DO - 10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37035822
AN - SCOPUS:85153401633
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in Veterinary Science
JF - Frontiers in Veterinary Science
SN - 2297-1769
M1 - 1107122
ER -
ID: 345423987