Whole-genome comparison of urinary pathogenic Escherichia coli and faecal isolates of UTI patients and healthy controls

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Whole-genome comparison of urinary pathogenic Escherichia coli and faecal isolates of UTI patients and healthy controls. / Nielsen, Karen Leth; Stegger, Marc; Kiil, Kristoffer; Godfrey, Paul A.; Feldgarden, Michael; Lilje, Berit; Andersen, Paal S.; Frimodt-Møller, Niels.

I: International Journal of Medical Microbiology, Bind 307, Nr. 8, 12.2017, s. 497-507.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nielsen, KL, Stegger, M, Kiil, K, Godfrey, PA, Feldgarden, M, Lilje, B, Andersen, PS & Frimodt-Møller, N 2017, 'Whole-genome comparison of urinary pathogenic Escherichia coli and faecal isolates of UTI patients and healthy controls', International Journal of Medical Microbiology, bind 307, nr. 8, s. 497-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.09.007

APA

Nielsen, K. L., Stegger, M., Kiil, K., Godfrey, P. A., Feldgarden, M., Lilje, B., Andersen, P. S., & Frimodt-Møller, N. (2017). Whole-genome comparison of urinary pathogenic Escherichia coli and faecal isolates of UTI patients and healthy controls. International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 307(8), 497-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.09.007

Vancouver

Nielsen KL, Stegger M, Kiil K, Godfrey PA, Feldgarden M, Lilje B o.a. Whole-genome comparison of urinary pathogenic Escherichia coli and faecal isolates of UTI patients and healthy controls. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2017 dec.;307(8):497-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.09.007

Author

Nielsen, Karen Leth ; Stegger, Marc ; Kiil, Kristoffer ; Godfrey, Paul A. ; Feldgarden, Michael ; Lilje, Berit ; Andersen, Paal S. ; Frimodt-Møller, Niels. / Whole-genome comparison of urinary pathogenic Escherichia coli and faecal isolates of UTI patients and healthy controls. I: International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2017 ; Bind 307, Nr. 8. s. 497-507.

Bibtex

@article{d6feb684d6bd4c06a31d56fb9301520e,
title = "Whole-genome comparison of urinary pathogenic Escherichia coli and faecal isolates of UTI patients and healthy controls",
abstract = "The faecal flora is a common reservoir for urinary tract infection (UTI), and Escherichia coli (E. coli) is frequently found in this reservoir without causing extraintestinal infection. We investigated these E. coli reservoirs by whole-genome sequencing a large collection of E. coli from healthy controls (faecal), who had never previously had UTI, and from UTI patients (faecal and urinary) sampled from the same geographical area. We compared MLST types, phylogenetic relationship, accessory genome content and FimH type between patient and control faecal isolates as well as between UTI and faecal-only isolates, respectively. Comparison of the accessory genome of UTI isolates to faecal isolates revealed 35 gene families which were significantly more prevalent in the UTI isolates compared to the faecal isolates, although none of these were unique to one of the two groups. Of these 35, 22 belonged to a genomic island and three putatively belonged to a type VI secretion system (T6SS). MLST types and SNP phylogeny indicated no clustering of the UTI or faecal E. coli from patients distinct from the control faecal isolates, although there was an overrepresentation of UTI isolates belonging to clonal lineages CC73 and CC12. One combination of mutations in FimH, N70S/S78N, was significantly associated to UTI, while phylogenetic analysis of FimH and fimH identified no signs of distinct adaptation of UTI isolates compared to faecal-only isolates not causing UTI. In summary, the results showed that (i) healthy women who had never previously had UTI carried faecal E. coli which were overall closely related to UTI and faecal isolates from UTI patients; (ii) UTI isolates do not cluster separately from faecal-only isolates based on SNP analysis; and (iii) 22 gene families of a genomic island, putative T6SS proteins as well as specific metabolism and virulence associated proteins were significantly more common in UTI isolates compared to faecal-only isolates and (iv) evolution of fimH for these isolates was not linked to the clinical source of the isolates, apart from the mutation combination N70S/S78N, which was correlated to UTI isolates of phylogroup B2. Combined, these findings illustrate that faecal and UTI isolates, as well as faecal-only and faecal-UTI isolates, are closely related and can only be distinguished, if at all, by their accessory genome.",
keywords = "Adaption, Environment, Evolution, Faecal flora, Fimbria, Genomes, Gut, Microbiota, Mutations, Next generation sequencing, NGS, Phylogeny, Polymorphism, SNPs, Urinary tract infection, Virulence, WGS",
author = "Nielsen, {Karen Leth} and Marc Stegger and Kristoffer Kiil and Godfrey, {Paul A.} and Michael Feldgarden and Berit Lilje and Andersen, {Paal S.} and Niels Frimodt-M{\o}ller",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.09.007",
language = "English",
volume = "307",
pages = "497--507",
journal = "International Journal of Medical Microbiology",
issn = "1438-4221",
publisher = "Elsevier GmbH - Urban und Fischer",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whole-genome comparison of urinary pathogenic Escherichia coli and faecal isolates of UTI patients and healthy controls

AU - Nielsen, Karen Leth

AU - Stegger, Marc

AU - Kiil, Kristoffer

AU - Godfrey, Paul A.

AU - Feldgarden, Michael

AU - Lilje, Berit

AU - Andersen, Paal S.

AU - Frimodt-Møller, Niels

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - The faecal flora is a common reservoir for urinary tract infection (UTI), and Escherichia coli (E. coli) is frequently found in this reservoir without causing extraintestinal infection. We investigated these E. coli reservoirs by whole-genome sequencing a large collection of E. coli from healthy controls (faecal), who had never previously had UTI, and from UTI patients (faecal and urinary) sampled from the same geographical area. We compared MLST types, phylogenetic relationship, accessory genome content and FimH type between patient and control faecal isolates as well as between UTI and faecal-only isolates, respectively. Comparison of the accessory genome of UTI isolates to faecal isolates revealed 35 gene families which were significantly more prevalent in the UTI isolates compared to the faecal isolates, although none of these were unique to one of the two groups. Of these 35, 22 belonged to a genomic island and three putatively belonged to a type VI secretion system (T6SS). MLST types and SNP phylogeny indicated no clustering of the UTI or faecal E. coli from patients distinct from the control faecal isolates, although there was an overrepresentation of UTI isolates belonging to clonal lineages CC73 and CC12. One combination of mutations in FimH, N70S/S78N, was significantly associated to UTI, while phylogenetic analysis of FimH and fimH identified no signs of distinct adaptation of UTI isolates compared to faecal-only isolates not causing UTI. In summary, the results showed that (i) healthy women who had never previously had UTI carried faecal E. coli which were overall closely related to UTI and faecal isolates from UTI patients; (ii) UTI isolates do not cluster separately from faecal-only isolates based on SNP analysis; and (iii) 22 gene families of a genomic island, putative T6SS proteins as well as specific metabolism and virulence associated proteins were significantly more common in UTI isolates compared to faecal-only isolates and (iv) evolution of fimH for these isolates was not linked to the clinical source of the isolates, apart from the mutation combination N70S/S78N, which was correlated to UTI isolates of phylogroup B2. Combined, these findings illustrate that faecal and UTI isolates, as well as faecal-only and faecal-UTI isolates, are closely related and can only be distinguished, if at all, by their accessory genome.

AB - The faecal flora is a common reservoir for urinary tract infection (UTI), and Escherichia coli (E. coli) is frequently found in this reservoir without causing extraintestinal infection. We investigated these E. coli reservoirs by whole-genome sequencing a large collection of E. coli from healthy controls (faecal), who had never previously had UTI, and from UTI patients (faecal and urinary) sampled from the same geographical area. We compared MLST types, phylogenetic relationship, accessory genome content and FimH type between patient and control faecal isolates as well as between UTI and faecal-only isolates, respectively. Comparison of the accessory genome of UTI isolates to faecal isolates revealed 35 gene families which were significantly more prevalent in the UTI isolates compared to the faecal isolates, although none of these were unique to one of the two groups. Of these 35, 22 belonged to a genomic island and three putatively belonged to a type VI secretion system (T6SS). MLST types and SNP phylogeny indicated no clustering of the UTI or faecal E. coli from patients distinct from the control faecal isolates, although there was an overrepresentation of UTI isolates belonging to clonal lineages CC73 and CC12. One combination of mutations in FimH, N70S/S78N, was significantly associated to UTI, while phylogenetic analysis of FimH and fimH identified no signs of distinct adaptation of UTI isolates compared to faecal-only isolates not causing UTI. In summary, the results showed that (i) healthy women who had never previously had UTI carried faecal E. coli which were overall closely related to UTI and faecal isolates from UTI patients; (ii) UTI isolates do not cluster separately from faecal-only isolates based on SNP analysis; and (iii) 22 gene families of a genomic island, putative T6SS proteins as well as specific metabolism and virulence associated proteins were significantly more common in UTI isolates compared to faecal-only isolates and (iv) evolution of fimH for these isolates was not linked to the clinical source of the isolates, apart from the mutation combination N70S/S78N, which was correlated to UTI isolates of phylogroup B2. Combined, these findings illustrate that faecal and UTI isolates, as well as faecal-only and faecal-UTI isolates, are closely related and can only be distinguished, if at all, by their accessory genome.

KW - Adaption

KW - Environment

KW - Evolution

KW - Faecal flora

KW - Fimbria

KW - Genomes

KW - Gut

KW - Microbiota

KW - Mutations

KW - Next generation sequencing

KW - NGS

KW - Phylogeny

KW - Polymorphism

KW - SNPs

KW - Urinary tract infection

KW - Virulence

KW - WGS

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.09.007

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29031453

AN - SCOPUS:85031315135

VL - 307

SP - 497

EP - 507

JO - International Journal of Medical Microbiology

JF - International Journal of Medical Microbiology

SN - 1438-4221

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 188481994